İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2025 · article

Comparison of Different Local Anaesthetics in Cervical Facet Medial Branch Blockade.

Dergi world neurosurg ISSN kaydı başka bir dergiye işaret ediyor; ad YÖKSİS kaydından.
ISSN1878-8769
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · hybrid
Yıl2025
Atıf0OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%0,1
FWCI0,01,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q2
WoS (JCR)Q2

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıworld neurosurg
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)World Neurosurgery
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

OBJECTIVE: Cervical medial branch blocks (CMBBs) are frequently used for the treatment of facet arthropathy. The present study compares the effectiveness of lidocaine and prilocaine in CMBB procedures. METHODS: Patients with facet arthropathy scheduled for CMBB were randomly divided into 2 groups who were administered a combination of 2 mg dexamethasone and either 1% lidocaine or 1% prilocaine with a total volume of 1 mL per level. All patients were assessed prior to the procedure (baseline), and at 1 hour, 1 week, and 1 month after the procedure using the Numeric Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and patient satisfaction was evaluated at 1 hour, 1 week, and 1 month after the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients were included in the study (n = 49 in the lidocaine group and n = 48 in the prilocaine group). A significant decrease was noted in the NRS-11 and NDI scores recorded during all follow-up assessments in both groups (P < 0.001), while the NRS-11, NDI scores, and patient satisfaction did not statistically differ between groups at 1 hour, 1 week, and 1 month following the procedure (P ˃ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: CMMB achieved with either lidocaine or prilocaine decreased the recorded pain severity and disability scores to a similar degree. The selection of either lidocaine or prilocaine for CMBB is thus at the clinician's discretion.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

0atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yazarlar

5
  1. HANZADE ÜNAL ERSOY 1
  2. AHMET BAŞARI 2
  3. GÜNGÖR ENVER ÖZGENCİL ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ 3
  4. ÖÖ Asiller 4
  5. BAŞAK CEYDA MEÇO ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ 5