İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2003 · article

In vitro evaluation of the dissolving effect of solvents on root canal sealers

Dergi Journal of Oral Science
OpenAlex Açık erişim · bronze
Yıl2003
Atıf30OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%78,1
FWCI1,161,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q2
WoS (JCR)Q4

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİS dergi adıJournal of Oral Science
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate two commonly used gutta-percha solvents for their effectiveness in dissolving several types of root canal sealers. Seven different sealers (AH26, AH Plus, Diaket, Roekoseal, Sankin Apatite Root Sealer, Sealapex, and Sultan U/P) were used in this study. After mixing according to the manufacturers' directions, each material was syringed into 30 glass capillary tubes, and a total of 210 tubes were placed in a humidifier at 37 degrees C for one week to allow the materials to set completely. Each group of 30 tubes, obturated with one type of sealer, was then randomly divided into three subgroups, including 10 tubes each. Chloroform was used in the first ten tubes from each sealer group. Halothane was used for the second group. In the last group, the sealer was removed with files, without using any solvent. The time necessary to pass a file through to the end of the tube was recorded for each sample in seconds. Results were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance. Sealapex did not set at all unless in contact with air. Roekoseal did not adhere to the glass capillary tubes, and was therefore easily removed from the tube in all samples. AH26 and AH Plus root canal sealers tightly adhered to the tube walls, so none of the techniques were effective in removing them from the tubes within 30 min. Diaket root canal sealer was easily removed using solvents (P < 0.05). There was no advantage in using solvents to remove Sankin Apatite Root Sealer (P > 0.05). Solvents were found to be very effective in dissolving the Sultan U/P root canal sealer (P < 0.05).

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

30atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 9 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2008 Solubility of root canal sealers with different organic solventsAtıf 41 · OpenAlex
  2. 2008 Solubility of root canal sealers with different organic solventsAtıf 41 · OpenAlex
  3. 2009 Effectiveness of HERO 642 versus Hedström files for removing gutta percha fillings in curved root canals an ex vivo studyAtıf 37 · OpenAlex
  4. 2009 Effectiveness of HERO 642 versus Hedström files for removing gutta percha fillings in curved root canals an ex vivo studyAtıf 36 · OpenAlex
  5. 2021 Microhardness evaluation of root dentin after the use of resin sealer solventsAtıf 2 · OpenAlex
  6. 2021 Microhardness evaluation of root dentin after using resin sealer solventsAtıf 2 · OpenAlex
  7. 2021 Microhardness evaluation of root dentin after using resin solvents.Atıf 2 · OpenAlex
  8. 2018 Comparison of the Fracture Resistance of the Roots Retreated Using Different Techniques with or Without GuttasolvAtıf 1 · OpenAlex
  9. 2024 BİYOSERAMİK ESASLI KÖK KANAL PATLARININ FİZİKOKİMYASAL ÖZELLİKLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİAtıf 0 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

Yazar bilgisi yok.