İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2019 · article

Dealing with the gray zones in the management of gastric cancer: The consensus statement of the İstanbul Group

Dergi Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology
ISSN****-****
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · green
Yıl2019
Atıf7OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%67,8
FWCI0,481,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q3
WoS (JCR)Q4

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıTurkish Journal of Gastroenterology
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

The geographical location and differences in tumor biology significantly change the management of gastric cancer. The prevalence of gastric cancer ranks fifth and sixth among men and women, respectively, in Turkey. The international guidelines from the Eastern and Western countries fail to manage a considerable amount of inconclusive issues in the management of gastric cancer. The uncertainties lead to significant heterogeneities in clinical practice, lack of homogeneous data collection, and subsequently, diverse outcomes. The physicians who are professionally involved in the management of gastric cancer at two institutions in Istanbul, Turkey, organized a consensus meeting to address current problems and plan feasible, logical, measurable, and collective solutions in their clinical practice for this challenging disease. The evidence-based data and current guidelines were reviewed. The gray zones in the management of gastric cancer were determined in the first session of this consensus meeting. The second session was constructed to discuss, vote, and ratify the ultimate decisions. The identification of the T stage, the esophagogastric area, imaging algorithm for proper staging and follow-up, timing and patient selection for neoadjuvant treatment, and management of advanced and metastatic disease have been accepted as the major issues in the management of gastric cancer. The recommendations are presented with the percentage of supporting votes in the results section with related data.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

7atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 5 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2020 Totally minimally invasive radical gastrectomy with the da Vinci Xi® robotic system versus straight laparoscopy for gastric adenocarcinomaAtıf 6 · OpenAlex
  2. 2020 Totally minimally invasive radical gastrectomy with the da Vinci Xi® robotic system versus straight laparoscopy for gastric adenocarcinomaAtıf 6 · OpenAlex
  3. 2020 Totally minimally invasive radical gastrectomy with the da Vinci Xi(R)robotic system versus straight laparoscopy for gastric adenocarcinomaAtıf 6 · OpenAlex
  4. 2020 Comment on “Dealing with the gray zones in the management of gastric cancer: The consensus statement of the İstanbul Group”Atıf 1 · OpenAlex
  5. 2021 Minimally invasive versus open surgery for gastric cancer in Turkish populationAtıf 0 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

32
  1. ERMAN AYTAÇ 1
  2. FATİH ASLAN 2
  3. BAHATTİN ÇİÇEK 3
  4. AYŞE SİBEL ERDAMAR ÇETİN 4
  5. BENGİ GÜRSES 5
  6. KORAY GÜVEN ACIBADEM MEHMET ALİ AYDINLAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ 6
  7. FİKRİ OKAN FALAY KOÇ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 7
  8. TAYFUN KARAHASANOĞLU ACIBADEM MEHMET ALİ AYDINLAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ 8
  9. FATİH SELÇUKBİRİCİK 9
  10. UĞUR SELEK 10
  11. BANU ATALAR 11
  12. EMRE BALIK 12
  13. Nurdan Tozun 13
  14. İZZET ROZANES 14
  15. ALİ ARICAN 15
  16. İsmail Hamzaoğlu 16
  17. BİLGİ BACA 17
  18. Nil Molinas Mandel 18
  19. MURAT SARUÇ 19
  20. SÜHA GÖKSEL 20
  21. GÖKHAN DEMİR 21
  22. FULYA AĞAOĞLU 22
  23. MUSTAFA CENGİZ YAKICIER 23
  24. UĞUR ÖZBEK 24
  25. VOLKAN ÖZBEN 25
  26. ENİS ÖZYAR 26
  27. AHMET LEVENT GÜNER 27
  28. Özlem Er 28
  29. Kerim Kaban 29
  30. YASEMİN ATAGÜN 30
  31. DURSUN BUĞRA 31
  32. İSMAİL HAKKI HAMZAOĞLU ACIBADEM MEHMET ALİ AYDINLAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ 32