İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2021 · article

Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Parameters Affecting Functional Outcomes and Survival Rates.

ISSN1090-3941
YÖKSİS OpenAlex
Yıl2021
Atıf17OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%88,6
FWCI2,231,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q3

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıSurgical technology international
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Surgical Technology International
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

INTRODUCTION: The development of new surgical techniques and devices, as well as the improvements in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy enabled intersphincteric resection (ISR), has reduced permanent colostomy usage. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term oncological and functional outcomes of patients who underwent partial ISR for rectal cancer located less than 5cm from the anal verge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A series of 106 consecutive patients with very low rectal cancer underwent curative partial ISR from January 2006 to September 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. One-hundred-three (97%) of 106 patients received neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local recurrence (LR) rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. The Wexner incontinence score and Kirwan classification were used to evaluate patients' functional results. RESULTS: The median follow up was 60 months (range, 18-174). The estimated five-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 89% and 81.6%, respectively. Five-year local recurrence and distant metastasis rates were 6.6% and 10.4%, respectively. There was no in-hospital and 30-day mortality. The median Wexner score was 9 (range, 0-20) for 72 patients. Age (<65 years, p=0.027) and gender (male, p=0.019) had a positive effect on functional outcomes after surgery. One and five years colostomy-free survival rates were 96% and 89%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Intersphincteric resection techniques are feasible for patients with very low rectal cancer, providing good oncological and functional outcomes.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

17atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 6 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2022 Robotic vs. laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a case matched study reporting a median of 7-year long-term oncological and functional outcomesAtıf 53 · OpenAlex
  2. 2022 Robotic vs. laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a case matched study reporting a median of 7-year long-term oncological and functional outcomes.Atıf 52 · OpenAlex
  3. 2022 Robotic vs. laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a case matched study reporting a median of 7-year long-term oncological and functional outcomesAtıf 52 · OpenAlex
  4. 2023 International standardization and optimization group for intersphincteric resection ( ISOG‐ISR ): modified Delphi consensus on anatomy, definition, indication, surgical technique, specimen description and functional outcomeAtıf 26 · OpenAlex
  5. 2023 Robotic and laparoscopic sphincter-saving resections have similar peri-operative, oncological and functional outcomes in female patients with rectal cancerAtıf 17 · OpenAlex
  6. 2025 The Shifting and Evolving Neoadjuvant Treatments and Surgical Platforms on Oncological Outcomes and Sphincter Preservation in Distal Rectal Cancer: A 23-Year Retrospective ExperienceAtıf 3 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

7
  1. VUSAL ALİYEV 1
  2. BESLEN GÖKSOY İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2
  3. SÜHA GÖKSEL 3
  4. KORAY GÜVEN ACIBADEM MEHMET ALİ AYDINLAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ 4
  5. BARIŞ BAKIR 5
  6. SEZER SAĞLAM 6
  7. OKTAR ASOĞLU 7