İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2026

Can household ultrasonic cleaners enhance the stain removal efficacy of chemical agents on orthodontic aligners?

BMC Oral Health

YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · gold SJR Q1 JCR Q1 Atıf 0 Yüzdelik 33.5% FWCI 0.0
Yıl
2026
ISSN
1472-6831
Tür
article

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİS YÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • OpenAlex OpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)

Özet

İngilizce (OpenAlex)

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of household ultrasonic cleaning with/without peroxide-based and peroxide-free cleaning methods for stain removal on polyurethane aligner material. METHODS: Seventy-two polyurethane aligner specimens (Invisalign, Align Technology Inc.) were stained for seven days in a standardized coffee solution and randomly assigned to six cleaning protocols (n = 12/group): peroxide-free cleaner (Invisalign Cleaning Crystals [ICC], Align Technology Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) or peroxide-based cleaner (Corega Proguard [CP], Stafford-Miller Limited, Waterford, Ireland), each applied without, 5, or 10 min of household ultrasonic assistance (Shantou Huan Te Tong Intelligent Technology Co., Guangdong, China; Serial No: 20240001) at 50 kHz. Color was measured at baseline (t0), after staining (t1), and after ultrasonuc cleaning (t2) using a spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade Compact; VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany). The CIEDE2000 formula was used to calculate color changes (ΔE00), specifically evaluating staining (ΔEt0-t1), net color change ((ΔEt0-t2), and cleaning efficacy (ΔEt1-t2). Data were analyzed using Repeated Measures and two-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni adjustment (significant at p < 0.017). RESULTS: All specimens showed comparable discoloration after staining (p > 0.05). Cleaning efficacy (ΔEt1–t2) did not differ between cleaning agents, ultrasonic durations, or their interaction (p > 0.05). Net color change (ΔEt0–t2) differed between agents (p = 0.018), with ICC exhibiting lower residual discoloration than CP. Although a significant agent-ultrasonic interaction was detected (p = 0.043), Bonferroni-adjusted post-hoc comparisons did not reveal any statistically significant pairwise differences between individual cleaning protocols. CONCLUSIONS: Household ultrasonic cleaning did not improve the stain-removal efficacy of either cleaning agent. Color recovery was primarily influenced by the chemical formulation of the cleaner rather than ultrasonic assistance.

Konular

  • Dental Erosion and Treatment
  • Dental materials and restorations
  • Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Birincil konu Dental Erosion and Treatment

Yazarlar

  1. YAĞMUR LENA SEZİCİ
  2. ASLI AŞIK
  3. GENTA AGANI SABAH İZMİR TINAZTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  4. SİBEL ACAR
  5. ENVER YETKİNER