İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2023 · article

A comparative study on daily evapotranspiration estimation by using various artificial intelligence techniques and traditional regression calculations

Dergi American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS) ISSN kaydı başka bir dergiye işaret ediyor; ad YÖKSİS kaydından.
ISSN1551-0018
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · gold
Yıl2023
Atıf10OpenAlex
Atıf11Semantic Scholar · 1 etkili
Yüzdelik%66,4
FWCI0,871,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q2
WoS (JCR)Q2

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıAmerican Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

Evapotranspiration is an important parameter to be considered in hydrology. In the design of water structures, accurate estimation of the amount of evapotranspiration allows for safer designs. Thus, maximum efficiency can be obtained from the structure. In order to accurately estimate evapotranspiration, the parameters affecting evapotranspiration should be well known. There are many factors that affect evapotranspiration. Some of these can be listed as temperature, humidity in the atmosphere, wind speed, pressure and water depth. In this study, models were created for the estimation of the daily evapotranspiration amount by using the simple membership functions and fuzzy rules generation technique (fuzzy-SMRGT), multivariate regression (MR), artificial neural networks (ANNs), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and support vector regression (SMOReg) methods. Model results were compared with each other and traditional regression calculations. The ET amount was calculated empirically using the Penman-Monteith (PM) method which was taken as a reference equation. In the created models, daily air temperature (T), wind speed (WS), solar radiation (SR), relative humidity (H) and evapotranspiration (ET) data were obtained from the station near Lake Lewisville (Texas, USA). The coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE) and average percentage error (APE) were used to compare the model results. According to the performance criteria, the best model was obtained by Q-MR (quadratic-MR), ANFIS and ANN methods. The R2, RMSE, APE values of the best models were 0,991, 0,213, 18,881% for Q-MR; 0,996; 0,103; 4,340% for ANFIS and 0,998; 0,075; 3,361% for ANN, respectively. The Q-MR, ANFIS and ANN models had slightly better performance than the MLR, P-MR and SMOReg models.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

10atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 2 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2024 Suspended Sediment Estimation Using Machine Learning MethodsAtıf 2 · OpenAlex
  2. 2026 Hybrid VMD-EMD Enhanced Machine Learning Models for Daily Reference Evapotranspiration ForecastingAtıf 1 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

7
  1. HASAN GÜZEL 1
  2. FATİH ÜNEŞ 2
  3. Merve Erginer 3
  4. YUNUS ZİYA KAYA 4
  5. BESTAMİ TAŞAR 5
  6. İbrahim Erginer 6
  7. MUSTAFA DEMİRCİ İSKENDERUN TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ 7