İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2014 · article

Relationship of admission neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio with in hospital mortality in patients with acute type I aortic dissection

YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · green TR Index
Yıl2014
Atıf34OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%82,4
FWCI1,351,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q3
WoS (JCR)Q4

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıTURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

AIM: Acute aortic dissection is a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is proposed as a prognostic marker and found to be related to worse clinical outcomes in various cardiovascular diseases. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between admission neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and in-hospital mortality in acute type I aortic dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 123 consecutive patients who had undergone emergent surgery for acute type I aortic dissection. Patients were divided into 2 groups as patients dying in the hospital (Group 1) and those discharged alive (Group 2). All parameters, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, were compared between the 2 groups and predictors of mortality was estimated by using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients (79 males, mean age: 55.2 + 14 years) were included in the final analysis. In multivariate analyses, cross- clamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, intensive care-unit duration, platelet count, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were found to be independent predictors of mortality. Patients with higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios had a significantly higher mortality rate (hazard ratio: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.01-1.10; P = 0.033). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that using a cut-off point of 8, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts mortality with a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 53%. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that admission neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a potential predictive parameter for determining the in-hospital mortality of acute type I aortic dissection.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

34atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 11 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2015 Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio: a novel marker for predicting hospital mortality of patients with acute type A aortic dissectionAtıf 57 · OpenAlex
  2. 2015 Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio: a novel marker for predicting hospital mortality of patients with acute type A aortic dissectionAtıf 57 · OpenAlex
  3. 2015 Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio: a novel marker for predicting hospital mortality of patients with acute type A aortic dissectionAtıf 57 · OpenAlex
  4. 2015 The Predictive Value of Admission Fragmented QRS Complex for In Hospital Cardiovascular Mortality of Patients with Type 1 Acute Aortic DissectionAtıf 12 · OpenAlex
  5. 2024 Design, synthesis, and evaluation of novel Indole-Based small molecules as sirtuin inhibitors with anticancer activitiesAtıf 7 · OpenAlex
  6. 2024 Design, synthesis, and evaluation of novel Indole‐Based small molecules as sirtuin inhibitors with anticancer activitiesAtıf 7 · OpenAlex
  7. 2024 Design, synthesis, and evaluation of novel Indole‐Based small molecules as sirtuin inhibitors with anticancer activitiesAtıf 6 · OpenAlex
  8. 2020 Analysis of Relationship Between Imaging Features of Aortic Dissection and Blood ParametersAtıf 1 · OpenAlex
  9. 2020 Analysis of Relationship Between Imaging Features of Aortic Dissection and Blood ParametersAtıf 1 · OpenAlex
  10. 2016 Relationship between neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio and in-hospital mortalityAtıf 0 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

12
  1. gökhan lafçı 1
  2. ömer faruk çiçek 2
  3. hacı alper uzun 3
  4. ADNAN YALÇINKAYA SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 4
  5. ADEM İLKAY DİKEN BAŞKENT ÜNİVERSİTESİ 5
  6. osman turak 6
  7. kumral çağlı 7
  8. irfan taşoğlu 8
  9. hikmet selçuk gedik 9
  10. kemal korkmaz 10
  11. orhan eren günertem 11
  12. KERİM ÇAĞLI 12