İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2018 · article

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness with Ultrasound Pachymetry, Noncontact Specular Microscopy and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

ISSN0882-0538
YÖKSİS OpenAlex
Yıl2018
Atıf15OpenAlex
Atıf15Semantic Scholar · 2 etkili
Yüzdelik%77,5
FWCI1,141,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q2
WoS (JCR)Q4

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıSeminars in Ophthalmology
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Seminars in Ophthalmology
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

BACKGROUND: To determine the agreement of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements taken with ultrasonic pachymetry (USP), spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and noncontact specular microscopy (NSM). METHODS: A prospective, observational, cross-sectional study was performed in the outpatient ophthalmology clinic. CCT was measured in a total of 147 eyes of 147 consecutive healthy patients with USP, NSM, and SD-OCT. Same examiner performed all examinations. Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the agreement between instruments. RESULTS: The average CCT values obtained by USP, NSM, and SD-OCT were 555 ± 37 µm, 554 ± 34 µm, and 546 ± 34 µm, respectively. There was a strong correlation between instruments: USP with SD-OCT (r = 0.937, p < 0.01), USP with NSM (r = 0.943, p < 0.01) SD-OCT with NSM (r = 0.975, p < 0.01) for CCT. The mean differences (lower/upper limit of agreement) for CCT measurements were -10 ± 12.9 µm (15.28/-35.28) between SD-OCT and USP, -8.1 ± 7.7 µm (7/-23.2) between SD-OCT and NSM, and 1.8 ± 12.3 µm (25.9/-22.3) between USP and NSM. CONCLUSIONS: USP and NSM were found to have comparable CCT measurements and these two methods can be used correspondingly. However, CCT measurements by SD-OCT were lower when compared to other methods.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

15atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 6 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2022 Central Corneal Thickness Measurements With Different Imaging Devices: Ultrasound Pachymetry, Noncontact Specular Microscopy and Tono-pachymetryAtıf 4 · OpenAlex
  2. 2022 Central Corneal Thickness Measurements With Different Imaging Devices: Ultrasound Pachymetry, Noncontact Specular Microscopy and Tono-pachymetryAtıf 4 · OpenAlex
  3. 2021 Comparison of Six Methods of Central Corneal Thickness Measurement in Healthy EyesAtıf 3 · OpenAlex
  4. 2021 Comparison of Six Methods of Central Corneal Thickness Measurement in Healthy EyesAtıf 3 · OpenAlex
  5. 2021 Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements of five different devices with ultrasound pachymetry in healthy eyesAtıf 3 · OpenAlex
  6. 2023 Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by ultrasound pachymetry, corneal topography, spectral domain- optical coherence tomography, and non-contact specular microscopyAtıf 0 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

5
  1. SEVİL KARAMAN ERDUR İSTANBUL MEDİPOL ÜNİVERSİTESİ 1
  2. GÖKTUĞ DEMİRCİ 2
  3. FUNDA DİKKAYA 3
  4. MEHMET SELİM KOCABORA İSTANBUL MEDİPOL ÜNİVERSİTESİ 4
  5. MUSTAFA ÖZSÜTÇÜ 5