İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2024 · article

Evaluation of wear and friction properties of graphite modified Lubri polylactic acid with various infill fabricated by additive manufacturing techniques

ISSN0272-8397
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · hybrid
Yıl2024
Atıf5OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%58,6
FWCI0,561,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q1
WoS (JCR)Q2

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıPolymer Composites
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Polymer Composites
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

Abstract Three‐dimension (3D) printing technology, also known as additive manufacturing, is a manufacturing technology that creates three‐dimensional objects by depositing material layer by layer, as opposed to subtractive manufacturing methods. However, the newness of the technology brings with it many unknowns. In particular, the raw materials used are constantly increasing. For this reason, testing each raw material used in many aspects and to determine the optimum production conditions is important for the wide use of 3D printing technology. These optimal conditions may be the parameters used to produce a material, and sometimes they can appear as a new material. In addition, the production of new materials with varying production parameters is fundamental research topic that requires comprehensive study. For all these purposes, in this study, a new material type known as Lubri PLA (LPLA) was selected and produced in different filling types and subjected to a series of friction and wear tests. Thus, it is aimed to determine the tribological properties of the material. Additionally, samples were produced in ten different infill types (grid, lines, triangels, hexagon, cubic, octal, zigzag, diagonal, diagonal 3D and gyroid) to show the effect of filler type on friction and wear behavior. These filler types were used for both PLA and Lubri PLA materials and a total of twenty samples were produced. Thereby, it is aimed to conduct a comprehensive study showing the effect of both material difference and filling type on friction‐wear behavior. Diameter deviations, hardness deviations, friction coefficient, temperature, specific wear rates (SWr), and vibration were selected as output parameters. According to the analysis of the test results, the best result in terms of material structure was given by Lubri PLA, while the best result in terms of filling type was obtained with Diagonal 3D filling type. In addition, the lowest vibration level was obtained in the LP‐Diagonal 3D sample with 0.041 mm/s 2 , while the highest vibration level was obtained in the P‐Grid sample with 1.756 mm/s 2 . Highlights LPLA closed to nominal value in diameter and hardness deviations Addition of graphite nanoparticle increased the dimensional accuracy Diagonal 3D infill type Lubri PLA composites showed the superior performance Graphite modified Lubri PLA composites demonstrated superior performance

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

5atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 3 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2026 A Comparative Study on the Influence of Stacking Sequence, Infill Ratio, and Infill Pattern on the Impact Performance of Functionally Layered PLA and PETG Fabricated by Additive ManufacturingAtıf 5 · OpenAlex
  2. 2026 A Comparative Study on the Influence of Stacking Sequence, Infill Ratio, and Infill Pattern on the Impact Performance of Functionally Layered PLA and PETG Fabricated by Additive ManufacturingAtıf 4 · OpenAlex
  3. 2026 A Comparative Study on the Influence of Stacking Sequence, Infill Ratio, and Infill Pattern on the Impact Performance of Functionally Layered PLA and PETG Fabricated by Additive ManufacturingAtıf 4 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

5
  1. ŞENOL ŞİRİN DÜZCE ÜNİVERSİTESİ 1
  2. ÇAĞRI VAKKAS YILDIRIM 2
  3. ALPEREN MEHMET SEVİNÇ TÜRK HAVA KURUMU ÜNİVERSİTESİ 3
  4. ALPERTUNGA CEYLAN ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ 4
  5. MUHAMMED İKBAL KARA ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ 5