İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2024 · article

Machine Learning-Based Classification of Soil Parent Materials Using Elemental Concentration and Vis-NIR Data

Dergi Sensors
ISSN1424-8220
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · gold
Yıl2024
Atıf5OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%60,5
FWCI0,651,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q1
WoS (JCR)Q2

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıSensors
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Sensors
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

In soil science, the allocation of soil samples to their respective origins holds paramount significance, as it serves as a crucial investigative tool. In recent times, with the increasing use of proximal sensing and advancements in machine-learning techniques, new approaches have accompanied these developments, enhancing the effectiveness of soil utilization in soil science. This study investigates soil classification based on four parent materials. For this purpose, a total of 59 soil samples were collected from 12 profiles and the vicinity of each profile at a depth of 0–30 cm. Surface soil samples were analyzed for elemental concentrations using X-Ray fluorescence (XRF) and inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) and soil spectra using a visible near-infrared (Vis-NIR) spectrometer. Soil samples collected from soil profiles (12 soil samples) and surface (47 soil samples) were used to classify parent materials using machine learning-based algorithms such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Ensemble Subspace k-Near Neighbor (ESKNN), and Ensemble Bagged Trees (EBTs). Additionally, as a validation of the classification techniques, the dataset was subjected to five-fold cross-validation and independent sample set splitting (80% calibration and 20% validation). Evaluation metrics such as accuracy, F score, and G mean were used to evaluate prediction performance. Depending on the dataset and algorithm used, the classification success rates varied between 70% and 100%. Overall, the ESKNN (99%) produced better results than other classification methods. Additionally, Relief algorithms were employed to identify key variables for each dataset (ICP-OES: CaO, Fe2O3, Al2O3, MgO, and MnO; XRF: SiO2, CaO, Fe2O3, Al2O, and MnO; Vis-NIR: 567, 571, 572, 573, and 574 nm). Subsequent soil reclassification using these reduced variables revealed reduced accuracies using Vis-NIR data, with ESKNN still yielding the best results.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

5atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 5 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2026 Estimation of protein content in wheat using traditional regression, hybrid models, and deep learningAtıf 2 · OpenAlex
  2. 2026 Estimation of protein content in wheat using traditional regression, hybrid models, and deep learningAtıf 2 · OpenAlex
  3. 2026 Predicting soil parent materials using machine learning models and spectral–elemental data (VNIRS, XRF, ICP)Atıf 0 · OpenAlex
  4. 2026 Predicting soil parent materials using machine learning models and spectral–elemental data (VNIRS, XRF, ICP)Atıf 0 · OpenAlex
  5. 2026 Predicting soil parent materials using machine learning models and spectral–elemental data (VNIRS, XRF, ICP)Atıf 0 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

6
  1. YÜSRA İNCİ 1
  2. ALİ VOLKAN BİLGİLİ 2
  3. RECEP GÜNDOĞAN 3
  4. GAFUR GÖZÜKARA ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 4
  5. KERİM KARADAĞ HARRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ 5
  6. MEHMET EMİN TENEKECİ 6