İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2018 · article

Does Robot Overcome Obesity-related Limitations of Minimally Invasive Rectal Surgery for Cancer?

YÖKSİS OpenAlex
Yıl2018
Atıf24OpenAlex
Atıf25Semantic Scholar · 1 etkili
Yüzdelik%75,5
FWCI0,861,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q2
WoS (JCR)Q3

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıSurgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy Percutaneous Techniques
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

BACKGROUND: Adoption of laparoscopic surgery for cancers requiring partial or total proctectomy has been slow due to difficulty of achieving oncologically adequate resection. Obesity is a factor complicating use and outcomes of laparoscopic technique for rectal surgery. Impact of obesity on the outcomes of robotic rectal surgery for cancer is not well defined. This study is designed to assess whether if the robotic technique has potential to overcome the limitations of obesity and to improve outcomes of minimally invasive rectal surgery for cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing robotic sphincter-saving radical resection with da Vinci Xi System between December 2014 and December 2016 were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups as obese and nonobese. Patient demographics, perioperative outcomes and short-term results were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The study included 101 patients (30 were obese). Sex (female: 35 vs. 37%, P=0.89), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (2 vs. 2, P=0.41), number of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation (39% vs. 23%, P=0.12) and history of prior abdominal surgery (28% vs. 23%, P=0.62) were comparable between the groups. Operative time was longer in the obese group (311 vs. 332 min. P=0.01). Overall complication rates (27% vs. 23%, P=0.72), length of hospital stay (6 vs. 7, P=0.10) and pathologic outcomes were similar between the groups. Conversion to laparoscopy was not required in any operation. Two nonobese patients required conversion to open surgery. CONCLUSION: Robotic rectal surgery for cancer in obese patients is equally safe and effective as in nonobese patients. The new robotic platform can facilitate to overcome obesity-related limitations of rectal surgery.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

24atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 2 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2018 Totally Robotic Versus Totally Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal CancerAtıf 28 · OpenAlex
  2. 2018 Totally Robotic Versus Totally Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal CancerAtıf 28 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

10
  1. ONUR BAYRAKTAR BİRUNİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 1
  2. ERMAN AYTAÇ İSTANBUL AREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2
  3. VOLKAN ÖZBEN ACIBADEM MEHMET ALİ AYDINLAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ 3
  4. DENİZ ATASOY 4
  5. İSMAİL AHMET BİLGİN 5
  6. İLKNUR ERENLER BAYRAKTAR 6
  7. BİLGİ BACA ACIBADEM MEHMET ALİ AYDINLAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ 7
  8. İSMAİL HAMZAOĞLU 8
  9. TAYFUN KARAHASANOĞLU ACIBADEM MEHMET ALİ AYDINLAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ 9
  10. İSMAİL HAKKI HAMZAOĞLU ACIBADEM MEHMET ALİ AYDINLAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ 10