Evaluation of time exposure of different irrigation agents on radicular dentin erosion

İngilizce (OpenAlex)

Aim: The amount of root dentin erosion caused by Ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), Glycolic acid (GA), and Etidronic acid (HEDP) solutions applied with sonic activation (SA) for 1 and 3 minutes during the final irrigation was evaluated in this in vitro study. Methods: Using 5 ml of 2.5% NaOCl irrigation solution in each sample, 70 mandibular premolars were enlarged with the Reciproc R25 rotary instrument system. The samples were randomly divided according to the final irrigation protocol into 6 experimental groups (n:10) and 1 control group (n:10): Group 1 (17% EDTA – 1 min SA), Group 2 (17% EDTA – 3 min SA), Group 3 (10% GA – 1 min SA), Group 4 (10% GA – 3 min SA), Group 5 (18% HEDP – 1 min SA), Group 1 (18% HEDP – 3 min SA) and Group 7 (Negative control group-distilled water, 1 min SA). The teeth were divided into two parts longitudinally after the final irrigation protocol. A low vacuum scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to image the samples’ coronal, middle, and apical root areas at x2000 magnification. Samples were evaluated using a triple-scoring system. Results: Data were analyzed by Shapiro Wilk, Kruskal Wallis H, Mann-Whitney U, and Dunn’s tests. There was no statistically significant difference between EDTA, GA, and HEDP in both periods (p > 0.05). Conclusion: We saw similar amounts of erosion in dentin in 1 and 3 minutes of chelation applications for all chelators. Considering the smear removal efficiency of chelators, there is no harm in increasing the time in terms of erosion. There is a need for studies on the clinical applicability of chelation with a different duration time. How to cite this article: Okumuş ÖF, Kaya S, Adıgüzel Ö, Yeniçeri Özata M. Evaluation of time exposure of different irrigation agents on radicular dentin erosion. J Med Dent Invest 2022;3:e221170. https://doi.org/10.5577/jomdi.e221170 Linguistic revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English. Checked for plagiarism: Yes