Makale detayı · 2017
Lingual orthodontic treatment: A YouTube™ video analysis
Dergi
The Angle OrthodontistISSN 0003-3219
ISSN kaydı başka bir dergiye işaret ediyor; ad YÖKSİS kaydından.
- Yıl
- 2017
- Tür
- article
Veri kaynağı ayrımı
- YÖKSİS YÖKSİS makale kaydı
- YÖKSİS dergi adı The Angle Orthodontist
- Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN) Angle Orthodontist
- OpenAlex OpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
Özet
OpenAlex · İngilizce
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the quality of information offered for patients seeking information on lingual orthodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: YouTube™ was searched for videos about lingual orthodontic treatment using the key word "lingual braces" from the Google Trends application. One hundred and four videos were selected to be analyzed from the first 120 results. The video content was evaluated using a 10-point score, which was used for classifying low- and high-content video groups. The video information and quality index (VIQI) was applied to determine the quality of the videos. The Mann-Whitney U-test, Chi-square test, and logistic regression analysis were used, and the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated for statistical evaluations. RESULTS: We classified 32 videos as high-content and 72 as low-content. Most videos were uploaded by laypeople (58.7%, n = 61). Definition of lingual braces and psychological impact were the most commonly discussed topics (51.0%), followed by speech performance (47.1%), pain (44.2%), tongue soreness (37.5%), and biomechanics (14.4%). Compared to the low-content group, the high-content video group had a significantly higher mean number of views (19,867.41 vs 6720.08, P = .002) and more "likes" (135.88 vs 13.01, P < .001), "dislikes" (4.34 vs 0.81, P < .001), and "comments" (26.28 vs 5.31, P = .002). There was no difference in the total VIQI score between the groups ( P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: The content of YouTube™ videos for lingual orthodontics was generally incomplete. Most videos mentioned psychological effects, but few videos discussed the biomechanics or procedure. Orthodontists should be aware of the information available on YouTube™.
Konular
Atıflar
OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.
205 atıf
OpenAlex cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)
Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 100 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).
- Are YouTube Videos Useful for Patients Interested in Botulinum Toxin for Bruxism? 2019
- Assessment of Reliability of YouTube Videos on Orthodontics 2019
- YouTube as a Patient-Information Source for Cleft Lip and Palate 2020
- Are YouTube Videos Related to Dental Implant Useful for Patient Education? 2020
- Are YouTube videos related to dental implant useful for patient education? 2020
- Are YouTube videos related to dental implant useful for patient education? 2020
- Evaluation of YouTube videos about smile design using the DISCERN tool and Journal of the American Medical Association benchmarks 2020
- Does YouTubeTM Offer High Quality Information? Evaluation of Accelerated Orthodontics Videos 2020
- The quality and reliability analysis of YouTube videos about insulin resistance 2023
- Is Information for Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion Available on YouTube Reliable? 2020