Platon ve Sofistlerde Tekhne ve Pathos KavramlarıI Üzerinden Bilgi, Hakikat ve Mugalata İlişkisini Okumak

OpenAlex Türkçe

This paper asserts that there is a solid distinction between Plato’s and Sophists’ conception of episteme knowledge , due to their slightly different gazes into the concept of tekhne art-technique . This text also applies Ebheri’s commentary on Isagoge, which is a convenient measure from a theological account in context; to observe that fallacies out of logic can be depend perspectively on pathos emotion . For Plato, sophistic techniques in order to telling the truth derive from a rhetorical truth-telling and include persuasive affect on people’s souls. Therefore, Sophistic judgments can not be grasped by Plato as they pretend to be correspond to true meanings of entities however, it can only be regarded as being a “matchmaker” between the compromised truth and the people’s emotions-pathos. In contrast to Sophists, Plato claims that this kind of approach creates dominance on people’s minds and also it may only be referred doxa opinion where the realm of unprivileged epistemological beliefs. Thus, Sophistic rhetoric leads to a Platonic refutation in terms of logic and truth-telling. The paper additionally intends to evoke the common grounds of Cyrenaic School’s understanding of pathos with Plato’s and their skeptical attitudes towards truth that determined by the lack of will. Finally, Derrida’s commentaries on Phaedrus dialogue will also be addressed in order to emphasize Plato’s critical standpoint on sophistry of technical knowledge, pathos-oriented truth and negative impacts of technical knowledge, especially writing