İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2006 · article

Project risk evaluation using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process An application to information technology projects

YÖKSİS OpenAlex Üst %10
Yıl2006
Atıf125OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%96,9
FWCI7,681,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q2
WoS (JCR)Q4

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)International Journal of Intelligent Systems
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

Projects are critical to the realization of performing organization's strategies. Each project contains some degree of risk and it is required to be aware of these risks and to develop the necessary responses to get the desired level of project success. Because projects' risks are multidimensional, they must be evaluated by using multi-attribute decision-making methods. The aim of this article is to provide an analytic tool to evaluate the project risks under incomplete and vague information. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as a suitable and practical way of evaluating project risks based on the heuristic knowledge of experts is used to evaluate the riskiness of an information technology (IT) project of a Turkish firm. The means of the triangular fuzzy numbers produced by the IT experts for each comparison are successfully used in the pairwise comparison matrices. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Int Syst 21: 559–584, 2006.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

125atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 18 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2009 Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methodsAtıf 535 · OpenAlex
  2. 2009 Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methodsAtıf 535 · OpenAlex
  3. 2009 Performance Evaluation of Turkish Cement Firms with Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS methodsAtıf 535 · OpenAlex
  4. 2008 Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selectionAtıf 456 · OpenAlex
  5. 2008 Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selectionAtıf 454 · OpenAlex
  6. 2014 Strategic Decision Selection Using Hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS and Interval Type 2 Fuzzy AHP A case studyAtıf 167 · OpenAlex
  7. 2019 Risk evaluation and prevention in hydropower plant operations: A model based on Pythagorean fuzzy AHPAtıf 146 · OpenAlex
  8. 2019 Risk evaluation and prevention in hydropower plant operations: A model based on Pythagorean fuzzy AHPAtıf 146 · OpenAlex
  9. 2017 Multi-criteria alternative-fuel technology selection using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy setsAtıf 114 · OpenAlex
  10. 2017 Multi-criteria alternative-fuel technology selection using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy setsAtıf 114 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

3
  1. FATİH TÜYSÜZ 1
  2. CENGİZ KAHRAMAN İSTANBUL TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2
  3. ELÇİN AYAZ 3