İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2020 · article

Temporal Trends in the Epidemiology of HIV in Turkey

ISSN1570-162X
YÖKSİS OpenAlex
Yıl2020
Atıf42OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%82,7
FWCI0,711,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q3
WoS (JCR)Q4

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıCurrent HIV Research
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Current HIV Research
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the temporal trends of HIV epidemiology in Turkey from 2011 to 2016. METHODS: Thirty-four teams from 28 centers at 17 different cities participated in this retrospective study. Participating centers were asked to complete a structured form containing questions about epidemiologic, demographic and clinical characteristics of patients presented with new HIV diagnosis between 2011 and 2016. Demographic data from all centers (complete or partial) were included in the analyses. For the cascade of care analysis, 15 centers that provided full data from 2011 to 2016 were included. Overall and annual distributions of the data were calculated as percentages and the Chi square test was used to determine temporal changes. RESULTS: A total of 2,953 patients between 2011 and 2016 were included. Overall male to female ratio was 5:1 with a significant increase in the number of male cases from 2011 to 2016 (p<0.001). The highest prevalence was among those aged 25-34 years followed by the 35-44 age bracket. The most common reason for HIV testing was illness (35%). While the frequency of sex among men who have sex with men increased from 16% to 30.6% (p<0.001) over the study period, heterosexual intercourse (53%) was found to be the most common transmission route. Overall, 29% of the cases presented with a CD4 count of >500 cells/mm3 while 46.7% presented with a CD4 T cell count of <350 cells/mm3. Among newly diagnosed cases, 79% were retained in care, and all such cases initiated ART with 73% achieving viral suppression after six months of antiretroviral therapy. CONCLUSION: The epidemiologic profile of HIV infected individuals is changing rapidly in Turkey with an increasing trend in the number of newly diagnosed people disclosing themselves as MSM. New diagnoses were mostly at a young age. The late diagnosis was found to be a challenging issue. Despite the unavailability of data for the first 90, Turkey is close to the last two steps of 90-90-90 targets.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

42atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 75 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2023 Modeling the future of HIV in Turkey: Cost-effectiveness analysis of improving testing and diagnosisAtıf 20 · OpenAlex
  2. 2023 Modeling the future of HIV in Turkey: Cost-effectiveness analysis of improving testing and diagnosisAtıf 20 · OpenAlex
  3. 2023 Modeling the future of HIV in Turkey: Cost-effectiveness analysis of improving testing and diagnosisAtıf 20 · OpenAlex
  4. 2023 Modeling the future of HIV in Turkey: Cost-effectiveness analysis of improving testing and diagnosisAtıf 20 · OpenAlex
  5. 2023 Modeling the future of HIV in Turkey: Cost-effectiveness analysis of improving testing and diagnosisAtıf 19 · OpenAlex
  6. 2023 Evaluation of the late presentation and associated factors of people living with HIV in TurkeyAtıf 9 · OpenAlex
  7. 2023 Late Diagnosis in HIV with New and Old Definitions; Data from a Regional Hospital in TurkeyAtıf 8 · OpenAlex
  8. 2023 Late Diagnosis in HIV with New and Old Definitions; Data from a Regional Hospital in TurkeyAtıf 8 · OpenAlex
  9. 2023 Late Diagnosis in HIV with New and Old Definitions; Data from a Regional Hospital in TurkeyAtıf 8 · OpenAlex
  10. 2022 Awareness of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men using apps for sexual encounters in TurkiyeAtıf 8 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

36
  1. FATMA ŞEBNEM ERDİNÇ 1
  2. BAŞAK DOKUZOĞUZ 2
  3. SERHAT ÜNAL 3
  4. SÜHEYLA KÖMÜR 4
  5. AHMET ÇAĞKAN İNKAYA 5
  6. DİLARA İNAN AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 6
  7. İBRAHİM KARAOĞLAN 7
  8. AYDIN DEVECİ ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ 8
  9. MUSTAFA KEMAL ÇELEN DİCLE ÜNİVERSİTESİ 9
  10. ŞÜKRAN KÖSE 10
  11. NURETTİN ERBEN 11
  12. GÖNÜL ÇİÇEK ŞENTÜRK 12
  13. YASEMİN HEPER 13
  14. SELDA SAYIN KUTLU 14
  15. ÇİĞDEM ATAMAN HATİPOĞLU 15
  16. ŞUA SÜMER 16
  17. BAHAR KANDEMİR 17
  18. FATMA SIRMATEL 18
  19. YAŞAR BAYINDIR 19
  20. E YILMAZ 20
  21. YASEMİN ERSOY 21
  22. ESRA KAZAK 22
  23. TANER YILDIRMAK 23
  24. BİRCAN KAYAASLAN 24
  25. KEMALETTİN ÖZDEN 25
  26. ALPER ŞENER 26
  27. ATEŞ KARA 27
  28. ÖZGÜR GÜNAL 28
  29. MEHMET SERHAT BİRENGEL 29
  30. AYHAN AKBULUT 30
  31. FUNDA YETKİN 31
  32. NEFİSE ÖZTOPRAK ÇUVALCI 32
  33. FATMA DENİZ SARGIN 33
  34. HÜSNÜ PULLUKÇU 34
  35. AYŞE DENİZ GÖKENGİN 35
  36. EMEL YILMAZ BURSA ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 36