İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2025 · article

Can artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot tools be used effectively for nutritional management in obesity?

ISSN0260-1060
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Üst %10
Yıl2025
Atıf12OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%92,9
FWCI3,571,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q3
WoS (JCR)Q4

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıNutrition and Health
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Nutrition and Health
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

Background Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), has been suggested as a tool for dietary planning in different diseases. Aim The study aimed to compare the energy, macro and micronutrients of the sample menu components presented by ChatGPT-4o and ChatGPT-4 for obesity with the Turkish Dietary Guidelines (TDG)-2022, evaluating their accuracy and clarity in medical nutrition management. Due to higher accuracy levels and the most preferred AI, ChatGPT-4o and ChatGPT-4 were selected for comparison. Methods A comparative content analysis was conducted using ChatGPT-4o, and ChatGPT-4 to generate 1800 kcal daily diet plans for a 20-year-old female with obesity. AI models provided recommendations for dietary management, the nutrition care process, and menu planning. Three dietitians evaluated the outputs. Data were analyzed using SPSS 24.0. Results ChatGPT-generated menus were inconsistent with dietary recommendations. Both ChatGPT-4o and ChatGPT-4 offered 5-day menu samples with low calorie content of “1800 kcal prompt” compared to the TDG-2022 ( P < 0.001 for ChatGPT-4o). Additionally, key nutrients, particularly fats ( P = 0.003), carbohydrates (%), potassium, and calcium ( P < 0.05 for all) were inadequately compared to the TDG-2022. Nutrient analysis revealed that both models underperformed in meeting recommended intakes for critical micronutrients such as calcium, and had an unbalanced distribution of macronutrients. Conclusion ChatGPT-4o and ChatGPT-4 have limitations when used to provide accurate dietary management. While AI chatbots offer useful insights, they cannot replace expertise of dietitians in clinical planning; as a result, caution is advised when using these tools in this context.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

12atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 7 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2025 Evaluating AI‐Generated Meal Plans for Simulated Diabetes Profiles: A Guideline‐Based Comparison of Three Language ModelsAtıf 14 · OpenAlex
  2. 2025 Evaluating AI‐Generated Meal Plans for Simulated Diabetes Profiles: A Guideline‐Based Comparison of Three Language ModelsAtıf 12 · OpenAlex
  3. 2025 Applications of generative and predictive AI in nutrition and dietetics: a narrative reviewAtıf 5 · OpenAlex
  4. 2026 AI in Nutrition: Multi-Criteria Analysis of Diet Plans Across Diverse Client ProfilesAtıf 1 · OpenAlex
  5. 2026 AI in nutrition: multi-criteria analysis of diet plans across diverse client profilesAtıf 1 · OpenAlex
  6. 2025 Accuracy of polyphenol content information in berries: A comparative analysis of ChatGPT and Phenol-ExplorerAtıf 0 · OpenAlex
  7. 2025 Accuracy of polyphenol content information in berries: A comparative analysis of ChatGPT and Phenol-ExplorerAtıf 0 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

3
  1. HATİCE MERVE BAYRAM İSTANBUL GELİŞİM ÜNİVERSİTESİ 1
  2. ZEHRA MARGOT ÇELİK 2
  3. HATİCE KÜBRA BARCIN GÜZELDERE İSTANBUL MEDENİYET ÜNİVERSİTESİ 3