Makale detayı · 2011 · article
evaluation of diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer
Veri kaynağı ayrımı
- YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
- YÖKSİS dergi adıAsian Journal of Surgery
- Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Asian Journal of Surgery
- OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
Özet
BACKGROUND: Diverting ileostomy is believed to mitigate the effects of anastomotic complications in low anterior resections (LAR) for rectal cancer. However, there are no data about the effects of diverting ileostomy on the outcomes of laparoscopic LAR METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 77 consecutive rectal cancer patients who had undergone laparoscopic LAR with (n = 23) or without (n = 54) diverting ileostomy. The patients' data were recorded and supplemented on short-term follow-up visits and included standard demographics, operative procedure, location of the cancer, and final pathologic diagnosis. We noted length of hospitalisation, complications, and time interval from ileostomy creation to closure. Morbidity and mortality were also included. RESULTS: Surgical intervention requiring anastomotic leakage occurred in three patients who underwent laparoscopic LAR without diverting ileostomy. The anastomosis level of patients who underwent laparoscopic LAR with diverting ileostomy was significantly lower than that of patients who underwent laparoscopic LAR without diverting ileostomy (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Anastomosis level and total mesorectal excision are the main factors for creation of diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic LAR Laparoscopic LAR without diverting ileostomy could be selectively performed. Our study provides a basis for further prospective randomised studies on the role of diverting ileostomy in LAR.
Konular
Atıflar
OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.
27atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)
Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 9 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).
- 2013 What Have We Gained by Performing Robotic Rectal Resection? Evaluation of 64 Consecutive Patients Who Underwent Laparoscopic or Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal AdenocarcinomaAtıf 42 · OpenAlex
- 2013 What Have We Gained by Performing Robotic Rectal Resection? Evaluation of 64 Consecutive Patients Who Underwent Laparoscopic or Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal AdenocarcinomaAtıf 42 · OpenAlex
- 2013 What Have We Gained by Performing Robotic Rectal Resection? Evaluation of 64 Consecutive Patients Who Underwent Laparoscopic or Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal AdenocarcinomaAtıf 42 · OpenAlex
- 2018 Totally Robotic Versus Totally Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal CancerAtıf 28 · OpenAlex
- 2018 Totally Robotic Versus Totally Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal CancerAtıf 28 · OpenAlex
- 2015 Hand-Assisted versus Straight-Laparoscopic versus Open Proctosigmoidectomy for Treatment of Sigmoid and Rectal Cancer: A Case-Matched Study of 100 PatientsAtıf 10 · OpenAlex
- 2020 Impact of Prolonged Neoadjuvant Treatment-surgery Interval on Histopathologic and Operative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Total Mesorectal Excision for Locally Advanced Rectal CancerAtıf 0 · OpenAlex
- 2020 Impact of Prolonged Neoadjuvant Treatment-surgery Interval on Histopathologic and Operative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Total Mesorectal Excision for Locally Advanced Rectal CancerAtıf 0 · OpenAlex
- 2020 Robotic management of complicated jejunal diverticulitis causing iliac bone osteomyelitis and abdominal wall fistula: a video vignetteAtıf 0 · OpenAlex