İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2012 · article

Epiploic Appendagitis: Is There Need for Surgery to Confirm Diagnosis in Spite of Clinical and Radiological Findings?

ISSN0364-2313
YÖKSİS OpenAlex
Yıl2012
Atıf42OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%80,3
FWCI1,421,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q1
WoS (JCR)Q2

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıWorld Journal of Surgery
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)World Journal of Surgery
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

BACKGROUND: The present retrospective study was conducted to review the authors' experience and describe clinical and radiologic features of epiploic appendagitis (EA), which is an uncommon, self-limiting clinical entity mimicking acute appendicitis and diverticulitis. Awareness of the features of EA would allow a correct diagnosis and avoid unnecessary surgical interventions. METHODS: Patients diagnosed as EA in one regional medical center between June 2006 and June 2010 were included. Clinical, laboratory, and imaging features of EA were studied, with particular attention to its unique radiologic appearances. RESULTS: Twenty patients (13 men and 7 women; average age 43.2 years) diagnosed with EA were included in the study. Localized abdominal pain without nausea, vomiting, and fever were the major presenting symptoms for all patients. Laboratory blood tests were normal, except in one patient with leukocytosis and two patients with increased serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. A noncompressible hyperechoic ovoid mass with hypoechoic border and without central blood flow on Doppler ultrasound (US) was detected in five of six patients. In all patients, the computed tomography (CT) scans revealed an ovoid fatty mass with hyperattenuating rim and disproportionate adjacent fat stranding. Central dot sign, concomitant old infarct, and lobulation were present in 75%, 20%, and 10% of the patients, respectively. All of the patients were treated conservatively. No recurrences occurred during the follow-up period (average: 24.8 months) in 18 (90%) of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with localized abdominal pain without other symptoms, diagnosis of EA should be considered. Recognizing the US and CT features of EA may allow an accurate diagnosis and avoid unnecessary surgery.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

42atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 7 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2014 A Rare Pathology Mimicing Acute Appendicitis; Epiploic AppendagitisAtıf 1 · OpenAlex
  2. 2014 A Rare Pathology Mimicing Acute Appendicitis; Epiploic AppendagitisAtıf 1 · OpenAlex
  3. 2014 A Rare Pathology Mimicing Acute Appendicitis Epiploic AppendagitisAtıf 1 · OpenAlex
  4. 2024 Epiploic appendagitis, an overlooked emergency in the daily practiceAtıf 0 · OpenAlex
  5. 2017 Torsion of epiploic appendices: An uncommon cause of acute abdomenAtıf 0 · OpenAlex
  6. 2017 An unusual cause of acute abdomen: epiploic appendagitisAtıf 0 · OpenAlex
  7. 2017 Torsion of epiploic appendices: An uncommon cause of acute abdomenAtıf 0 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

3
  1. MUSTAFA HASBAHÇECİ 1
  2. CENGİZ EROL İSTANBUL MEDİPOL ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2
  3. MEHMET ŞEKER İSTANBUL MEDİPOL ÜNİVERSİTESİ 3