İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2024 · article

Assessment of machine learning methods predicting the axial vibration frequencies of microbars

YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · bronze
Yıl2024
Atıf16OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%83,5
FWCI1,811,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q2
WoS (JCR)Q1

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıZAMM - Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)ZAMM Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

Abstract Microbars are one of the important components of microelectromechanical systems. With the recent increase in their applications, the importance of understanding their mechanical response has become an important topic. In this study, for the first time, the mechanical behavior of microbars based on the strain gradient theory is investigated using a machine learning (ML) approach. Four distinct ML models, namely artificial neural network (ANN), support vector regression (SVR), decision tree regression (DTR), and random forest regression (RFR), are developed for microbars with clamped boundary conditions. The performance of these models is individually assessed using five different metrics: coefficient of determination ( R 2 ), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and Nash‐Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE). The best‐performing model is selected based on these comparisons. Additionally, a semi‐analytical approach is employed to determine the natural frequencies of microbars under general elastic boundary conditions using the Fourier sine series and Stokes' transform. While the R 2 value for all four models indicated a good fit of 0.999, the percentage difference in MAE and RMSE values between the training and testing data for DTR and RFR models was relatively higher as compared to ANN and SVR. The results showed that ANN and SVR models exhibit the best performance in predicting the natural frequencies on both training and testing data across all three metrics. Finally, a study on the free axial vibration frequencies of microbar under various effects was conducted.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

16atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 18 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2025 An Inverse Parameter Identification in Finite Element Problems Using Machine Learning-Aided Optimization FrameworkAtıf 42 · OpenAlex
  2. 2025 An Inverse Parameter Identification in Finite Element Problems Using Machine Learning-Aided Optimization FrameworkAtıf 41 · OpenAlex
  3. 2024 Vibration analysis of embedded porous nanobeams under thermal effects using boosting machine learning algorithms and semi-analytical approachAtıf 27 · OpenAlex
  4. 2024 Vibration analysis of embedded porous nanobeams under thermal effects using boosting machine learning algorithms and semi-analytical approachAtıf 27 · OpenAlex
  5. 2025 Analysis of the contact problem functionally graded layer placed on a Pasternak foundationAtıf 23 · OpenAlex
  6. 2025 Analysis of the contact problem functionally graded layer placed on a Pasternak foundationAtıf 23 · OpenAlex
  7. 2025 Analysis of the contact problem functionally graded layer placed on a Pasternak foundationAtıf 23 · OpenAlex
  8. 2025 Analysis of the contact problem functionally graded layer placed on a Pasternak foundationAtıf 23 · OpenAlex
  9. 2025 Analysis of the contact problem functionally graded layer placed on a Pasternak foundationAtıf 23 · OpenAlex
  10. 2025 A machine learning approach for buckling analysis of a bi-directional FG microbeamAtıf 22 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

4
  1. Aiman Tariq 1
  2. BÜŞRA UZUN BURSA ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2
  3. BABÜR DELİKTAŞ BURSA ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 3
  4. MUSTAFA ÖZGÜR YAYLI BURSA ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 4