İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2021 · article

Enzalutamide versus Abiraterone Acetate as first-line treatment of castration resistant metastatic prostate cancer in geriatric (>= 75) patients

Dergi Journal of Mens Health ISSN kaydı başka bir dergiye işaret ediyor; ad YÖKSİS kaydından.
ISSN1875-6867
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · gold
Yıl2021
Atıf5OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%64,9
FWCI0,521,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q4
WoS (JCR)Q4

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıJournal of Mens Health
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Journal of Men's Health
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

Introduction: The efficacy and tolerability of Enzalutamide and Abiraterone Acetate have been reported in elderly patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, there is no randomized study directly comparing antitumor effects between these 2 agents in geriatric patients. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Enzalutamide (ENZA) and Abiraterone Acetate (AA) as a first-line treatment of mCRPC in elderly patients. Materials and methods: The geriatric patients (≥75 years of age) with a diagnosis of mCRPC and treated with first-line ENZA or AA were included. The impacts of clinical parameters and treatment modalities on overall survival (mOS) were analyzed retrospectively and Cox regression analysis was performed. Results: One hundred thirty-four mCRPC patients (77 in AA, 57 in ENZA), with a median age of 81 (75–93) were analyzed. The patient and disease characteristics were similar between arms. While there were more grade 1–2 toxicities in AA arm (45.5% vs 17.5%, P = 0.001), the discontinuation due to toxicity was similar between groups (8.5% vs 5.9%, P = 0.81). The mOS was 18.0 months (95% CI, 15.2–20.7) in AA, and 20.0 months (95% CI, 4.4–35.5) in ENZA arm (P = 0.47). In multivariate analysis, high Gleason score (≥8) (HR: 2.0 (95% CI, 1.1–3.4), P = 0.009) and high initial PSA values (≥100 ng/mL) (HR: 2.6 (95% CI, 1.5–4.8), P = 0.001) were poor prognostic factors. The choice of AA vs ENZA was insignificant as a predictor of OS (HR: 0.87 (95%CI, 0.48–1.56), P = 0.65). Conclusion: In the first-line treatment of mCRPC in elderly (≥75) patients, AA and ENZA showed similar results in terms of mPFS and mOS. The clinical impacts of second-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors in the elderly population should be tested in prospective randomized studies.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

5atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yazarlar

29
  1. ALİ ALKAN 1
  2. ZEYNEP GÜLSÜM GÜÇ İZMİR KATİP ÇELEBİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2
  3. MUSTAFA GÜRBÜZ BAŞKENT ÜNİVERSİTESİ 3
  4. GÜLİZ ÖZGÜN 4
  5. SERKAN DEĞİRMENCİOĞLU 5
  6. MUTLU DOĞAN 6
  7. TUĞBA AKIN TELLİ 7
  8. ÖZGE KESKİN 8
  9. ÇAĞATAY ARSLAN İZMİR EKONOMİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 9
  10. BURAK BİLGİN 10
  11. SEMA SEZGİN GÖKSU 11
  12. HACER DEMİR 12
  13. ELİF BERNA KÖKSOY ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ 13
  14. OSMAN KÖSTEK 14
  15. İSMAİL ERTÜRK 15
  16. TEOMAN ŞAKALAR 16
  17. ARZU YAŞAR 17
  18. GÖRKEM TÜRKKAN 18
  19. BÜŞRA KASIM 19
  20. AZİZ KARAOĞLU DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ 20
  21. ÖMÜR BERNA ÇAKMAK ÖKSÜZOĞLU 21
  22. PERRAN FULDEN YUMUK 22
  23. MEHMET ALİ NAHİT ŞENDUR 23
  24. HASAN ŞENOL COŞKUN 24
  25. İRFAN ÇİÇİN 25
  26. NURİ KARADURMUŞ 26
  27. ÖZGÜR TANRIVERDİ 27
  28. HAKAN AKBULUT 28
  29. YÜKSEL ÜRÜN ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ 29