İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2021 · article

A comparison of the fusion model of deep learning neural networks with human observation for lung nodule detection and classification

ISSN0007-1285
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · bronze Üst %10
Yıl2021
Atıf29OpenAlex
Atıf23Semantic Scholar · 2 etkili
Yüzdelik%91,6
FWCI2,751,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q2
WoS (JCR)Q2

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıThe British Journal of Radiology
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)British Journal of Radiology
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic performance of a newly developed artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm derived from the fusion of convolution neural networks (CNN) versus human observers in the estimation of malignancy risk in pulmonary nodules. METHODS: The study population consists of 158 nodules from 158 patients. All nodules (81 benign and 77 malignant) were determined to be malignant or benign by a radiologist based on pathologic assessment and/or follow-up imaging. Two radiologists and an AI platform analyzed the nodules based on the Lung-RADS classification. The two observers also noted the size, location, and morphologic features of the nodules. An intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated for both observers and the AI; ROC curve analysis was performed to determine diagnostic performances. RESULTS: < 0.001, for all three). Eighteen (11.3%) nodules were not detected and analyzed by the AI. Observer 1, observer 2, and the AI had an AUC of 0.917 ± 0.023, 0.870 ± 0.033, and 0.790 ± 0.037 in the ROC analysis of malignity probability, respectively. The observers were in almost perfect agreement for localization, nodule size, and lung-RADS classification [κ (95% CI)=0.984 (0.961-1.000), 0.978 (0.970-0.984), and 0.924 (0.878-0.970), respectively]. CONCLUSION: The performance of the fusion AI algorithm in estimating the risk of malignancy was slightly lower than the performance of the observers. Fusion AI algorithms might be applied in an assisting role, especially for inexperienced radiologists. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: In this study, we proposed a fusion model using four state-of-art object detectors for lung nodule detection and discrimination. The use of fusion of deep learning neural networks might be used in a supportive role for radiologists when interpreting lung nodule discrimination.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

29atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 12 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2022 A CT-Based Radiomic Signature for the Differentiation of Pulmonary Hamartomas from Carcinoid TumorsAtıf 16 · OpenAlex
  2. 2022 A CT-Based Radiomic Signature for the Differentiation of Pulmonary Hamartomas from Carcinoid TumorsAtıf 16 · OpenAlex
  3. 2022 A CT-Based Radiomic Signature for the Differentiation of Pulmonary Hamartomas from Carcinoid TumorsAtıf 16 · OpenAlex
  4. 2022 A CT-Based Radiomic Signature for the Differentiation of Pulmonary Hamartomas from Carcinoid TumorsAtıf 16 · OpenAlex
  5. 2024 Are deep learning classification results obtained on CT scans fair and interpretable?Atıf 6 · OpenAlex
  6. 2024 Are deep learning classification results obtained on CT scans fair and interpretable?Atıf 6 · OpenAlex
  7. 2024 Are deep learning classification results obtained on CT scans fair and interpretable?Atıf 6 · OpenAlex
  8. 2024 Are deep learning classification results obtained on CT scans fair and interpretable?Atıf 6 · OpenAlex
  9. 2024 Are deep learning classification results obtained on CT scans fair and interpretable?Atıf 6 · OpenAlex
  10. 2024 Are deep learning classification results obtained on CT scans fair and interpretable?Atıf 6 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

8
  1. AYŞEGÜL GÜRSOY ÇORUH ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ 1
  2. BÜLENT MUSTAFA YENİGÜN 2
  3. ÇAĞLAR UZUN ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ 3
  4. YUSUF KAHYA 4
  5. EMRE UTKAN BÜYÜKCERAN 5
  6. ATİLLA HALİL ELHAN 6
  7. KAAN ORHAN 7
  8. AYTEN KAYI CANGIR ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ 8