İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2010 · article

Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in detection of proximal caries

ISSN0250-832X
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · green Üst %10
Yıl2010
Atıf139OpenAlex
Atıf132Semantic Scholar · 9 etkili
Yüzdelik%95,8
FWCI5,541,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q1

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıDentomaxillofacial Radiology
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the in vitro diagnostic ability of visual inspection, film, charge-coupled device (CCD) sensor, photostimulable phosphor (PSP) sensor and cone beam CT in the detection of proximal caries in posterior teeth compared with the histological gold standard. METHODS: Visual inspection, film, CCD, PSP and cone beam CT images were used to detect proximal caries in the mesial and distal surfaces of 138 teeth (276 surfaces). Visual inspection and evaluation of all intraoral digital and conventional radiographs and cone beam CT images were performed twice by three oral radiologists. Weighted kappa coefficients were calculated to assess intra- and interobserver agreement for each image set, and scores were compared with the histological gold standard using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to evaluate diagnostic ability. RESULTS: Intraobserver kappa coefficients calculated for each observer for each method of detecting caries ranged from 0.739 to 0.928. Strong interobserver agreement ranging from 0.631 to 0.811 was found for all detection methods. The highest Az values for all three observers were obtained with the cone beam CT images; however, differences between detection methods were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Visual inspection, film, CCD, PSP plates and cone beam CT performed similarly in the detection of proximal caries.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

139atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 38 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2012 Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiographyAtıf 133 · OpenAlex
  2. 2012 Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiographyAtıf 133 · OpenAlex
  3. 2012 Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiographyAtıf 133 · OpenAlex
  4. 2012 Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiographyAtıf 133 · OpenAlex
  5. 2015 Use of dentomaxillofacial cone beam computed tomography in dentistryAtıf 72 · OpenAlex
  6. 2017 Comparison of diagnostic methods for early interproximal caries detection with near-infrared light transillumination: an in vivo studyAtıf 43 · OpenAlex
  7. 2017 The effects of different restorative materials on the detection of approximal caries in cone-beam computed tomography scans with and without metal artifact reduction modeAtıf 38 · OpenAlex
  8. 2013 Visibility of Artificial Buccal Recurrent Caries Under Restorations Using Different Radiographic TechniquesAtıf 29 · OpenAlex
  9. 2013 Visibility of Artificial Buccal Recurrent Caries Under Restorations Using Different Radiographic TechniquesAtıf 29 · OpenAlex
  10. 2013 Visibility of Artificial Buccal Recurrent Caries Under Restorations Using Different Radiographic TechniquesAtıf 29 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

6
  1. buğra şenel 1
  2. KIVANÇ KAMBUROĞLU ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2
  3. CEMİLE ÖZLEM ÜÇOK 3
  4. SELCEN YÜKSEL 4
  5. TUNCER ÖZEN 5
  6. İSMAİL HAKAN AVSEVER 6