İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2020

Outcomes with ureteral access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery: a retrospective comparative analysis

Dergi

Annals of Saudi Medicine

ISSN 0256-4947

YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · diamond SJR Q3 JCR Q3 Atıf 16 Yüzdelik 73.0% FWCI 0.66
Yıl
2020
Tür
article

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİS YÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adı Annals of Saudi Medicine
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN) Annals of Saudi Medicine
  • OpenAlex OpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)

Özet

OpenAlex · İngilizce

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Retrograde intrarenal surgery is used for treatment of urinary system stones. The ureteral access sheath (UAS) is used to decrease intrapelvic pressure, help with access of multiple instruments, and facilitate drainage and removal of the fragmented stones. OBJECTIVE: Assess the effect of the UAS on the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery. DESIGN: A retrospective patient data review. SETTING: Training and research hospital in Turkey. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the data of patients who had undergone retrograde intrarenal surgery between 2012-2019. Patients who had kidney anomalies, were <18 years old, and who had ureteral and urethral strictures were excluded from the study. The demographic characteristics, stone type, complications, intraoperative and postoperative data of the patients were reviewed. A successful outcome was defined as being stone free or having clinically insignificant residual fragments (<3 mm). The use of the UAS was compared with other procedures in terms of efficiency and safety. Factors determining UAS usage were assessed by multivariate analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stone free rate and complication rate in patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery. SAMPLE SIZE: 1808 patients met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The UAS was used in 1489 procedures, while other methods were used in 319 procedures. Operation time was 46.9 (17.3) minutes and 42.9 (19.0) minutes with other methods. Postoperative double J stent usage rates were 88.2% and 63% in the UAS and other methods, respectively. The rate of successful outcome was 88.2% and 81.2% in the UAS and other methods, respectively ( P <.001). The rate of complications was similar in both groups ( P =.543). In a multivariate analysis, UAS usage was directly proportional with stone size and inversely proportional with preoperative JJ stent usage CONCLUSION: The UAS can be effectively and successfully used in retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of urinary system stones. UAS usage should be considered for the patients who have large stones (2 cm) and do not have a preoperative double J stent. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

16 atıf

OpenAlex cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yazarlar

  1. SERCAN SARI
  2. Mehmet Çağlar Çakıcı
  3. Aykut Aykaç
  4. ÖZER BARAN
  5. VOLKAN SELMİ YOZGAT BOZOK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  6. AHMET NİHAT KARAKOYUNLU