İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2015 · article

The Radiological and Stereological Analysis of the Effect of Low Level Laser Therapy on the Mandibular Midline Distraction Osteogenesis

ISSN1049-2275
YÖKSİS OpenAlex SJR Q2 JCR Q4
Yıl2015
Atıf10OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%77,6
FWCI1,01,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q2
WoS (JCR)Q4

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of low level laser therapy (LLLT) on bone mineral density by using high-resolution computerized tomography (HR-CT) and stereology in patients subjected to mandibular midline distraction. METHODS: Nine patients between the ages of 13 and 16 years with mandibular transverse deficiency (>5 mm) were evaluated. Mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis was performed for all the patients. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the control group (n = 4) and the laser group (n = 5). GaAlAs, 830 nm wavelength, power of 40 mW, energy of 8.4 J/cm2 dose per spot, was directly applied from 2 points on the mandibular midline. The laser was applied in 8 treatment sessions at 48-hour intervals. Bone mineral density and volume of the newly formed bone were analyzed using HR-CT and stereological methods. RESULTS: A higher bone mineral density rate was found in the laser group (P < 0.05). A higher newly formed immature bone rate was found in the control group (P < 0.001). These findings suggest that more mature bone may also have a greater mineral organization than that of immature newly formed bone, which is shown by HR-CT and stereological results. CONCLUSIONS: The retention period can be shortened and mineralization may be increased by using LLLT in mandibular distraction osteogenesis.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

10atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 14 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2017 Is it possible to change of the duration of consolidation period in the distraction osteogenesis with the repetition of extracorporeal shock waves?Atıf 19 · OpenAlex
  2. 2017 Is it possible to change of the duration of consolidation period in the distraction osteogenesis with the repetition of extracorporeal shock waves?Atıf 19 · OpenAlex
  3. 2017 Is it possible to change of the duration of consolidation period in the distraction osteogenesis with the repetition of extracorporeal shock waves?Atıf 19 · OpenAlex
  4. 2021 YouTube as a Source of Information for Craniofacial Distraction OsteogenesisAtıf 18 · OpenAlex
  5. 2021 YouTube as a Source of Information for Craniofacial Distraction OsteogenesisAtıf 18 · OpenAlex
  6. 2019 The assessment of new bone formation induced by unfocused extracorporeal shock wave therapy applied on pre-surgical phase of distraction osteogenesisAtıf 10 · OpenAlex
  7. 2019 The assessment of new bone formation induced by unfocused extracorporeal shock wave therapy applied on pre-surgical phase of distraction osteogenesisAtıf 10 · OpenAlex
  8. 2018 Bereket C, Cakir-Özkan N, Önger M E, Arıcı S.” The Effect of Different Doses of Extracorporeal Shock Waves on Rabbit Mandibular Distraction”.Atıf 10 · OpenAlex
  9. 2018 The Effect of Different Doses of Extracorporeal Shock Waves on Experimental Model Mandibular DistractionAtıf 10 · OpenAlex
  10. 2025 Experimental investigation of the effects of allantoin on mandibular distraction osteogenesisAtıf 1 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

22
  1. NİLÜFER ÖZKAN 1
  2. MEHMET CİHAN BEREKET ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2
  3. NURSEL ARICI 3
  4. MUZAFFER ELMALI ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ 4
  5. İSMAİL ŞENER 5
  6. ESENGÜL ŞEN 6
  7. HALUK ZÜLFİKAR 7
  8. MÜNEVVER TURANLI 8
  9. HALİM İŞSEVER 9
  10. ERAY YURTSEVEN 10
  11. SEÇKİN ÖZMEN 11
  12. AYŞE NİLÜFER NARLI 12
  13. VEYSEL BOZKURT 13
  14. İRFAN DOĞAN 14
  15. MUSTAFA TALAS 15
  16. METİN TUNÇ 16
  17. SUAT KARAGÖZ 17
  18. SENA TATAR 18
  19. HALİL İBRAHİM GÜNDÜZ 19
  20. SÜLEYMAN SIRRI ZÜLFİKAR 20
  21. SENA ÖNER 21
  22. HÜSEYİN İÇEN 22