İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2025 · article

Benchmarking ML Approaches for Earthquake-Induced Soil Liquefaction Classification

Dergi Discover Applied Sciences ISSN kaydı başka bir dergiye işaret ediyor; ad YÖKSİS kaydından.
ISSN2076-3417
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · gold
Yıl2025
Atıf3OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%79,9
FWCI1,321,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q2
WoS (JCR)Q2

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıDiscover Applied Sciences
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

Earthquake-induced soil liquefaction represents a critical geotechnical challenge due to its nonlinear soil–seismic interactions and its impact on structural safety. Traditional empirical methods often rely on simplified assumptions, limiting their predictive capability. This study develops and compares six machine learning (ML) classifiers—namely, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN), Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), and Naïve Bayes (NB)—to evaluate liquefaction susceptibility using an original dataset of 461 soil layers obtained from borehole penetration tests in the Edremit region (Balıkesir, NW Turkey). The models were trained and validated using normalized geotechnical and seismic parameters, and their performance was assessed based on accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results demonstrate that SVM, ANN, and kNN consistently outperformed other models, achieving test accuracies above 93%, F1 scores exceeding 98%, and AUC values between 0.933 and 0.953. In contrast, DT and NB exhibited limited generalization (test accuracy of 84–88% and AUC of 0.78–0.82), while RF showed partial overfitting. In contrast, DT and NB exhibited weaker generalization, with test accuracies of 84% and 88% and AUC values of 0.78 and 0.82, respectively, while RF indicated partial overfitting. The findings confirm the superior capability of advanced ML models, particularly SVM, ANN, and kNN, in capturing complex nonlinear patterns in soil liquefaction. This study provides a robust framework and original dataset that enhance predictive reliability for seismic hazard assessment in earthquake-prone regions.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

3atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 5 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2026 Linking Tea Aroma Chemistry to Quality Grades via a Single MOS Gas Sensor: Classical Machine Learning vs. Deep LearningAtıf 5 · OpenAlex
  2. 2026 Signal Intelligence: Vibration-Driven Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection of Rotary-Wing UAVsAtıf 4 · OpenAlex
  3. 2026 Signal Intelligence: Vibration-Driven Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection of Rotary-Wing UAVsAtıf 4 · OpenAlex
  4. 2026 Leakage-Free Benchmarking of Electronic Noses for Beef Freshness: A Signal-Richness Criterion for Model SelectionAtıf 1 · OpenAlex
  5. 2026 Confidence-Gated Triage: Coupling Drug–Target Affinity and ADME-T Predictions to Prioritise Compounds for DockingAtıf 0 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

4
  1. NURAY KORKMAZ CAN 1
  2. ERKAN CANER ÖZKAT 2
  3. NURCİHAN CERYAN BALIKESİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ 3
  4. ŞENER CERYAN BALIKESİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ 4