İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2016 · article

Anthropometric Analysis of Orbital Region and Age-Related Changes in Adult Women

Dergi J Craniofac Surg. ISSN kaydı başka bir dergiye işaret ediyor; ad YÖKSİS kaydından.
ISSN1049-2275
YÖKSİS OpenAlex
Yıl2016
Atıf23OpenAlex
Atıf18Semantic Scholar · 2 etkili
Yüzdelik%65,9
FWCI0,331,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q3
WoS (JCR)Q4

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıJ Craniofac Surg.
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

PURPOSE: Normal morphometric values of the orbital region vary according to age, sex, and ethnicity. The purpose of this study was to determine the normal values of orbital region and analysis age-related changes in adult women. METHODS: Measurements were performed on 311 healthy women, aged between 20 and 87. Subjects were divided into 3 age groups: young (20-44), middle aged (45-59), and old adults (60 and up). The anthropometric measurements of orbital region were performed on the photographs by using IT version 3.00 software programs. RESULTS: The mean values of interpupillar distance and nasofrontal angle were 64.20 ± 5.06 mm, 149.21 ± 9.12° respectively. In young, middle, and old groups the values of outer canthal distance were 92.98 ± 5.85, 91.00 ± 7.04, and 88.02 ± 6.13 mm; inner canthal distances were 31.30 ± 3.07, 31.72 ± 3.51, and 31.66 ± 3.44 mm. Palpebral fissure areas were 163.41 ± 29.98, 144.01 ± 30.90, and 129.11 ± 27.21 mm. Palpebral fissure lengths were 29.96 ± 1.76, 28.45 ± 1.96, and 26.81 ± 1.95 mm; palpebral fissure widths were 9.27 ± 1.21, 8.57 ± 1.25, and 7.98 ± 1.18 mm. Inner canthal angles were 39.29 ± 6.04°, 37.57 ± 6.58°, and 35.78 ± 5.80°; outer canthal angles were 53.90 ± 8.90°, 51.48 ± 8.87°, and 49.87 ± 9.78°. Visible iris areas were 96.04 ± 15.04, 88.63 ± 16.27, and 81.73 ± 14.03 mm, respectively. Interpupillary distance and inner chantal distance measurements showed no significant difference with age. As other measurements were determined decreased with age (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The authors believe that knowing the normal size of the structures in the orbital region and age-related changes will be useful to maintain the facial proportions in the plastic and reconstructive surgery and to protect aesthetic appearance of the face.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

23atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 17 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2021 Craniofacial Anthropometry of Healthy Turkish Young Adults: Outer Canthal, Inner Canthal, Palpebral Fissure, and Interpupillary DistancesAtıf 16 · OpenAlex
  2. 2021 Anthropometric Analysis of the Orbital Region in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Healthy ControlsAtıf 9 · OpenAlex
  3. 2021 Confusion of the Standardization in Craniofacial Soft Tissue Measurements: Frankfort Horizontal Plane or Natural Head Position?Atıf 8 · OpenAlex
  4. 2024 Analysis of anthropometric measurements taken from the periocular region in healthy young individuals with different somatotypesAtıf 3 · OpenAlex
  5. 2024 Analysis of anthropometric measurements taken from the periocular region in healthy young individuals with different somatotypesAtıf 3 · OpenAlex
  6. 2024 Analysis of anthropometric measurements taken from the periocular region in healthy young individuals with different somatotypesAtıf 3 · OpenAlex
  7. 2024 Clues for Facial Perceived Age: Exercise, Sun Protection, Photoaging, and Anthropometric Properties: An Observational Cross-Sectional StudyAtıf 2 · OpenAlex
  8. 2020 Face anthropometry of Turkish PopulationAtıf 2 · OpenAlex
  9. 2025 GENÇ ERİŞKİNLERDE KRANİYOFASİYAL ÖLÇÜMLERİN VE FASİYAL ASİMETRİNİN CİNSİYETE GÖRE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASIAtıf 1 · OpenAlex
  10. 2025 GENÇ ERİŞKİNLERDE KRANİYOFASİYAL ÖLÇÜMLERİN VE FASİYAL ASİMETRİNİN CİNSİYETE GÖRE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASIAtıf 1 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

4
  1. FİGEN KOÇ DİREK MARDİN ARTUKLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ 1
  2. MUSTAFA DENİZ 2
  3. AYŞE İMGE USLU 3
  4. SEMAHAT DOĞRU YUVARLAKBAŞ 4