Kültürel Miras, Güç ve Politik Meşruiyet; Napolyon Dönemi Sanat Yağmaları Üzerine Eleştirel Bir Değerlendirme /Cultural Heritage, Power, and Political Legitimacy: A Critical Assessment of Art Looting During the Napoleonic Period

OpenAlex · Türkçe

While war is often defined by armed conflict and military violence, it should also be considered a destructive act targeting the identity structures and cultural heritage of societies. War targets cultural assets as representatives of collective social memory, symbols of sovereignty, and instruments of ideological power. This study examines the constantly evolving justifications and legitimacy of practices aimed at seizing cultural heritage as war spoils, focusing on the Napoleonic art looting that significantly influenced the transformation of these practices. The central question of this study is how cultural artifacts, as constitutive elements of social identity, become targeted in times of war and armed conflict. The targeting of cultural heritage based on the values it represents has formed the basis of debates concerning legitimacy, ownership, and the return of cultural heritage to the societies to which it belongs. This targeting of cultural heritage on the grounds of its representation has formed the basis of ongoing debates regarding legitimacy, ownership, and the return of cultural heritage to the societies to which it belongs. Today, these debates tend to treat restitution claims as legal disputes, considered independently of the context of cultural heritage. One of the article's theses is that such debates are linked to historically continuous practices of cultural appropriation and symbolic domination. This study aims to analyze the seizure of cultural heritage as war booty from a historical perspective, to reveal the changing meaning of cultural heritage as booty from antiquity to the modern age, and to critically examine the Napoleonic art looting that marks a significant turning point. This study aims to reveal how heritage has been systematically instrumentalized as part of military and political dominance strategies during wartime, and how these practices have shaped contemporary legal, political, and ethical debates about who owns culture. The primary reason for focusing on the Napoleonic era in this study's analysis of how cultural heritage was handled in different historical conflicts is that during this period, cultural heritage ceased to be an accidental victim of war and became an integral part of military and political strategy. The main research materials of the study, including historical narratives, diplomatic records, museum histories, and legal texts, provide a multi-dimensional analysis of cultural plunder. This research utilizes historical narratives, diplomatic records, museum histories, and legal texts as research materials, enabling a multidimensional analysis of cultural plunder as both practice and discourse. Within the framework discussed above, the plunder of works of art during the Napoleonic era is examined critically as a manifestation of the empire's cultural dominance. It analyzes how Napoleon Bonaparte incorporated the seizure of works of art into his military campaign strategies, treating it as a form of cultural plunder that strengthened France's political authority and imperial ideology. Through treaties, expert commissions, and institutionalized collection practices, works of art were transferred from conquered territories to France and exhibited in the Napoleonic Museum. At this stage, plunder was justified by narratives of cultural universality and civilizational superiority, presenting France as the legitimate guardian of Europe's artistic heritage. This process deprived communities of their cultural heritage while simultaneously redefining the ownership and meaning of cultural value within a hierarchical international order. These concepts of meaning and ownership are addressed in the study within the context of two theoretical frameworks. Cultural nationalism, which advocates for the return of cultural heritage to its homeland within the framework of historical justice and collective rights by highlighting the intrinsic relationship established between cultural heritage and the identity of the source society, and cultural internationalism, which supports the idea of universal heritage and global protection, largely legitimize the retention of cultural objects within the hands of dominant powers. This study, which evaluates Napoleon's acts of cultural plunder within this framework, reveals how claims of universality are used to mask historically constructed unequal power relations and legitimize cultural dispossession. Furthermore, the study examines, through historical analysis, the development of international law concerning the protection of cultural heritage in the context of today's increasing demands for restitution. In this context, while international law assumes a regulatory role to prevent the appropriation of cultural heritage, the study argues that historical foundations and enduring power imbalances in international relations limit its effectiveness. The study demonstrates that hat during periods of war and armed conflict, the regulatory and preventive power of law sometimes becomes ineffective, and societies, with all their segments and elements, become more vulnerable to violations, thus making cultural heritage an inevitable primary target.