Makale detayı · 2016 · article
Borderline ovarian tumors: clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes - a multicenter study
Veri kaynağı ayrımı
- YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
- YÖKSİS dergi adıJournal of Ovarian Research
- Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Journal of Ovarian Research
- OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
- Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)
Özet
BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical management and staging of borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) are controversial. Institutions have different surgical approaches for the treatment of BOTs. Here, we performed a retrospective review of clinical characteristics, surgical management and surgical outcomes, and sought to identify variables affecting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with BOTs. METHODS: A retrospective review of ten gynecological oncology department databases in Turkey was conducted to identify patients diagnosed with BOTs. The effects of type of surgery, age, stage, surgical staging, complete versus incomplete staging, and adjuvant chemotherapy were examined on DFS and OS. RESULTS: In total, 733 patients with BOTs were included in the analysis. Most of the staged cases were in stage IA (70.4 %). In total, 345 patients underwent conservative surgeries. Recurrence rates were similar between the conservative and radical surgery groups (10.5 % vs. 8.7 %). Furthermore we did not find any difference between DFS (HR = 0.96; 95 % confidence interval, CI = 0.7-1.2; p = 0.576) or OS (HR = 0.9; 95 % CI = 0.8-1.1; p = 0.328) between patients who underwent conservative versus radical surgeries. There was also no difference in DFS (HR = 0.74; 95 % CI = 0.8-1.1; p = 0.080) or OS (HR = 0.8; 95 % CI = 0.7-1.0; p = 0.091) between complete, incomplete, and unstaged patients. Furthermore, receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) for tumor stage ≥ IC was not an independent prognostic factor for DFS or OS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing conservative surgery did not show higher recurrence rates; furthermore, survival time was not shortened. Detailed surgical staging, including lymph node sampling or dissection, appendectomy, and hysterectomy, were not beneficial in the surgical management oF BOTs.
Konular
Atıflar
OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.
38atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)
Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 16 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).
- 2019 Clinicopathological analysis of borderline ovariantumours and risk factors related to recurrence:experience of single institutionAtıf 33 · OpenAlex
- 2019 Clinicopathological analysis of borderline ovarian tumours and risk factors related to recurrence: experience of single institutionAtıf 33 · OpenAlex
- 2019 Clinicopathological Analysis of Borderline Ovarian Tumours and Risk Factors Related to Recurrence: Experience of Single InstitutionAtıf 33 · OpenAlex
- 2018 Clinicopathological analysis of borderline ovarian tumours and risk factors related to recurrence: experience of single institutionAtıf 33 · OpenAlex
- 2017 The Impact of Surgical Staging on the Prognosis of Mucinous Borderline Tumors of the Ovaries: A Multicenter StudyAtıf 28 · OpenAlex
- 2017 The Impact of Surgical Staging on the Prognosis of Mucinous Borderline Tumors of the Ovaries: A Multicenter StudyAtıf 28 · OpenAlex
- 2017 The Impact of Surgical Staging on the Prognosis of Mucinous Borderline Tumors of the Ovaries: A Multicenter StudyAtıf 28 · OpenAlex
- 2017 The impact of surgical staging on the prognosis of mucinous borderline tumors of the ovaries: A multicenter study.Atıf 28 · OpenAlex
- 2017 The Impact of Surgical Staging on the Prognosis of Mucinous Borderline Tumors of the Ovaries: A Multicenter StudyAtıf 28 · OpenAlex
- 2017 The Impact of Surgical Staging on the Prognosis of Mucinous Borderline Tumors of the Ovaries: A Multicenter StudyAtıf 28 · OpenAlex