İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2019 · article

Prevalence of second canal in the mesiobuccal root of permanent maxillary molars from a Turkish subpopulation: a cone-beam computed tomography study

ISSN0015-5659
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · diamond
Yıl2019
Atıf18OpenAlex
Atıf16Semantic Scholar · 2 etkili
Yüzdelik%87,5
FWCI2,271,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q3
WoS (JCR)Q4

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıFolia Morphologica
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Folia Morphologica (Poland)
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

BACKGROUND: Permanent maxillary molar teeth have the most complex root and canal systems. This study aimed to determine the frequency and the localisation of secondary mesiobuccal canal (MB2) in the mesiobuccal roots of permanent maxillary molars in a Turkish subpopulation using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and compare them by different age groups and gender. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 800 maxillary molar teeth in 200 subjects were investigated. The distances between canals were calculated from the centre point of the MB2 canal (PMB2) to the centre point of the mesiobuccal canal (PMB1) and the centre point of the palatal canal (PP). RESULTS: The incidence of MB2 canals was found to be 33.5% (23.2% in females, 43.6% in males) in 200 subjects. A significant difference was found between age groups and genders in terms of the frequency of MB2 (p < 0.05). The distances between PMB1- -PMB2 were 2.95 ± 0.58 mm, 3.08 ± 0.67 mm for 1MM and 2MM, respectively. For 1MM and 2MM, the averages of PMB2-PP distances were 5.81 ± 1.09 mm and 5.55 ± 1.09 mm, respectively. The contralateral formation of the MB2 canals was 90.5% (16, 26) in the first molars and 93.9% in the second molars (17, 27). The contingency rate in the first quadrant was 86.0% (16, 17) and 83.5% (26, 27) in the second quadrant. CONCLUSIONS: It is important for the clinician to know the high probability of finding the MB2 canal in the maxillary first and second molars. CBCT imaging can facilitate the clinician to detect complex and variable root canal anatomy.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

18atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 8 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2021 Analysis of root and canal morphology of fused and separate rooted maxillary molar teeth in Turkish populationAtıf 21 · OpenAlex
  2. 2023 Association between second mesiobuccal canal and apical periodontitis in retrospective cone-beam computed tomographic images.Atıf 9 · OpenAlex
  3. 2023 Association between second mesiobuccal canal and apical periodontitis in retrospective cone‐beam computed tomographic imagesAtıf 9 · OpenAlex
  4. 2022 Association between second mesiobuccal canal and apical periodontitis in retrospective cone‐beam computed tomographic imagesAtıf 9 · OpenAlex
  5. 2021 Comparison of second mesiobuccal canal prevalence of maxillary molar teeth by gender and age in a Turkish subpopulation: A cone-beam computed tomography studyAtıf 1 · OpenAlex
  6. 2021 Comparison of second mesiobuccal canal prevalence of maxillary molar teeth by gender and age in a Turkish subpopulation: A cone-beam computed tomography studyAtıf 1 · OpenAlex
  7. 2025 EVALUATION OF THE PREVALENCE AND LOCATION OF SECOND MESIOBUCCAL CANALS IN 2100 UPPER FIRST AND SECOND MOLAR TEETH: A CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY STUDYAtıf 0 · OpenAlex
  8. 2025 Evaluation Of The Prevalence And Location Of Second Mesiobuccal Canals In 2100 Upper First And Second Molar Teeth: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography StudyAtıf 0 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

2
  1. GÜLDANE MAĞAT NECMETTİN ERBAKAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ 1
  2. SELÇUK HAKBİLEN 2