İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2020 · article

Efficiency of cytology samples for pd-l1 evaluation and comparison with tissue samples

ISSN1309-5730
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · diamond TR Index
Yıl2020
Atıf6OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%60,1
FWCI0,381,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q3

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıTurk Patoloji Dergisi
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Turk Patoloji Dergisi
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

OBJECTIVE: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death. PD-L1 blockers have become a first-line option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Guidelines require the assessment of PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry. Although tissue samples are widely used, cytologic samples could be an alternative. In this study, we compared cytologic samples with tissue samples for PD-L1 evaluation in NSCLC cases. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Koç University Hospital, Department of Pathology Laboratory Information System was scanned for all PD-L1 tests performed on NSCLC cases, either on tissue samples or cell blocks. The type of the biopsy/aspiration procedure, the tumor type, patient demographics, and the percentage of PD-L1 positive tumor cells were recorded. A total of 73 tissue samples and 49 cell blocks were found to be eligible for the study. RESULTS: The PD-L1 positivity score was at least 1% in 44 of 73 samples of the tissue group and 19 of 49 samples of the cell block group. Tissue samples showed significantly higher positivity compared to the cell blocks (p=0.020). Comparing the frequency of cases with ≥50% positivity showed no statistically significant difference. A comparison of PD-L1 positivity rates of only the small biopsies and cell blocks also showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: Although they harbor a limited number of tumor cells, cell blocks prepared from cytologic samples are good alternatives for PD-L1 testing. However, large resections should be used for PD-L1 evaluation whenever possible since even 1% positivity may affect the treatment decision.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

6atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 5 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2024 Novel ALK immunohistochemistry assay (clone OTI1A4, Dako) is a sensitive, reliable marker for identifying ALK rearrangements in lung adenocarcinomas: A validation study.Atıf 1 · OpenAlex
  2. 2023 Novel ALK immunohistochemistry assay (clone OTI1A4, Dako) is a sensitive, reliable marker for identifying ALK rearrangements in lung adenocarcinomas : A validation studyAtıf 1 · OpenAlex
  3. 2023 Novel ALK IHC Assay (clone: OTI1A4, Dako) is a Sensitive and Reliable Marker for Identifying ALK Rearrangements in Lung Adenocarcinomas: A Validation StudyAtıf 1 · OpenAlex
  4. 2026 Small Samples, Big Insights: PD-L1 Experience of a Tertiary Institution.Atıf 0 · OpenAlex
  5. 2022 Analysis of PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Results for Different Sampling Procedures of Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma. Can We Use Cell Blocks for Evaluation of PD-L1?Atıf 0 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

4
  1. İBRAHİM KULAÇ KOÇ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 1
  2. Aydin Aslı 2
  3. PINAR BULUTAY KOÇ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 3
  4. PINAR FIRAT 4