Makale detayı · 2017 · article
Comparison of the Effects of Local and Systemic Zoledronic Acid Application on Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis
Veri kaynağı ayrımı
- YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
- YÖKSİS dergi adıJOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY
- Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
- OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
- Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)
Özet
Bisphosphonates are antibone resorptive drugs that are used to prevent bone tissue resorption in several skeletal diseases. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of systemic and local applications of zoledronic acid (ZA) on newly regenerated bone in a model of experimental distraction osteogenesis (DO). To do this mandibular DO was applied to 30 adult female Sprague Dawley rats, which were randomly divided into 3 groups: control, DO only, systemic zoledronic acid (SZA), and local zoledronic acid (LZA). In the LZA group, the gap between the bone fragments was filled with a gelatin sponge soaked in 2 mg of ZA and 0.1 mL of sterile saline. In the SZA group, a single dose of 0.1 mg/kg ZA was administered systemically. After the surgery, there was a 5-day latent waiting period and 10-day distraction phase. Following a 28-day consolidation period, the rats were euthanized and their mandibles were collected. The distracted bone area was seen to be filled with newly regenerated bone tissue in all 3 groups, both histologically and histomorphometrically. In addition, amounts of new bone formation, osteoblast cella, osteoclast (OC) cells, osteopontin, and vascular endothelial growth factor in the SZA and LZA groups were found to be higher when compared with the controls. Furthermore, in the SZA group, new bone formation, osteoblast, OC, osteopontin, and vascular endothelial growth factor were detected in significant amounts compared with the LZA group. Osteoclast numbers did not differ in a statistically significant manner in the SZA group with respect to the LZA group. Based on the results of this study, systemic and local applications of ZA could increase the formation of new bone in patients of DO, and systemic application is a more effective method compared with local application.
Konular
Atıflar
OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.
18atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)
Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 21 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).
- 2018 A comparison of different bone graft materials in peri-implant guidedbone regenerationAtıf 40 · OpenAlex
- 2018 A comparison of different bone graft materials in peri-implant guided bone regenerationAtıf 40 · OpenAlex
- 2018 A comparison of different bone graft materials in peri-implant guided bone regenerationAtıf 40 · OpenAlex
- 2018 A comparison of different bone graft materials in peri-implant guidedbone regenerationAtıf 39 · OpenAlex
- 2018 Systemic melatonin application increases bone formation in mandibular distraction osteogenesisAtıf 19 · OpenAlex
- 2018 Systemic melatonin application increases bone formation in mandibular distraction osteogenesis.Atıf 19 · OpenAlex
- 2018 Systemic melatonin application increases bone formation in mandibular distraction osteogenesisAtıf 19 · OpenAlex
- 2018 Systemic melatonin application increases bone formation in mandibular distraction osteogenesisAtıf 19 · OpenAlex
- 2018 Systemic melatonin application increases bone formation in mandibular distraction osteogenesisAtıf 19 · OpenAlex
- 2021 Biomechanical Evaluation of Implant Osseointegration After Guided Bone Regeneration With Different Bone GraftsAtıf 12 · OpenAlex