İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2020

Plurality and crosslinguistic variation: an experimental investigation of the Turkish plural

Dergi

Natural Language Semantics

ISSN 0925-854X

YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · hybrid SJR Q1 Atıf 9 Üst %10 Yüzdelik 95.2% FWCI 4.61
Yıl
2020
Tür
article

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİS YÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adı NATURAL LANGUAGE SEMANTICS
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN) Natural Language Semantics
  • OpenAlex OpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)

Özet

OpenAlex · İngilizce

Abstract In English and many other languages, the interpretation of the plural is associated with an ‘exclusive’ reading in positive sentences and an ‘inclusive’ reading in negative ones. For example, the plural nountulipsin a sentence such asChicken planted tulipssuggests that Chicken planted more than one tulip (i.e., a reading which ‘excludes’ atomic individual tulips). At the same time, however, the corresponding negative sentenceChicken didn’t plant tulipsdoesn’t merely convey that he didn’t plant more than one tulip, but rather that he didn’t plantanytulip (i.e., ‘including’ atomic individual tulips). Different approaches to the meaning contribution of the English plural vary in how they account for this alternation across the polarities, but converge on assuming that (at least one of) the denotation(s) of the plural should include atomic individuals. Turkish, on the other hand, is cited as one of the few known languages in which the plural only receives an exclusive interpretation (e.g., Bale et al. Cross-linguistic representations of numerals and number marking. in: Li, Lutz (eds) Semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) 20, CLC Publications, Ithaca, pp 582–598, 2010). More recent proposals have, however, argued that the Turkish plural should in fact be analysed more like the English plural (e.g., Sağ, The semantics of number marking: reference to kinds, counting, and optional classifiers, PhD dissertation, Rutgers University, 2019). We report two experiments investigating Turkish-speaking adults’ and preschool-aged children’s interpretation of positive and negative sentences containing plural nouns. The results provide clear evidence forinclusiveinterpretations of the plural in Turkish, supporting accounts that treat the Turkish and English plurals alike. We briefly discuss how an inclusive meaning of the Turkish plural can be integrated within a theory of the Turkish number system which captures some idiosyncratic properties of the singular and the agreement between number and number numerals.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

9 atıf

OpenAlex cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 2 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. The Plural is Unmarked: Evidence from Turkish, Hungarian and German 2023 Atıf 0 · OpenAlex
  2. Semantics of Turkish plural marking revisited 2022 Atıf 0 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

  1. Agata Renans
  2. YAĞMUR SAĞ PARVARDEH
  3. FATMA NİHAN KETREZ SÖZMEN İSTANBUL BİLGİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  4. Lyn Tieu
  5. Raffaella Folli
  6. George Tsoulas
  7. Hanna de Vries
  8. Jacopo Romoli