İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2015

New conduction defects and pacemaker implantation after heart transplantation

Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

YÖKSİS OpenAlex SJR Q3 JCR Q4 Atıf 0 Yüzdelik 37.4% FWCI 0.0
Yıl
2015
ISSN
1301-5680
Tür
article

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİS YÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • OpenAlex OpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)

Özet

İngilizce (OpenAlex)

Background: This study aims to determine the incidence of new conduction defects and pacemaker implantation and to identify patient characteristics for a permanent pacemaker need after biatrial orthotopic heart transplantation. Methods: Between February 1998 and August 2014, we retrospectively analyzed the data of 212 consecutive patients (147 males, 65 females; mean age 39.6±15 years; range 5 to 65 years) who underwent heart transplantation with biatrial cuff technique in our clinic. Baseline characteristics and postoperative data were compared among the patients who required a pacemaker or did not. Results: The incidence of permanent pacing after heart transplantation was 6.4%. The most frequent reason for permanent pacing was symptomatic bradycardia. Previous cardiac surgery was associated with a non-significant trend toward a need for permanent pacing (p=0.056). The presence of a ventricular assist device was a found to be associated with both prolonged temporary and permanent pacemaker requirement after biatrial cardiac transplantation (p=0.021 and p=0.042, respectively). Conclusion: Although bradyarrhythmia and need for temporary pacing were common in the early postoperative period, few of these patients needed permanent pacemaker implantation. The need for a permanent pacemaker seems to be more frequent after challenging operations, such as bridge to heart transplantation with a long-term ventricular assist device.

Konular

  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Birincil konu Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes

Yazarlar

  1. ÇAĞATAY ENGİN
  2. SERKAN ERTUGAY
  3. Kemal Hatice Soner
  4. HATİCE ŞAHİN EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  5. TAHİR YAĞDI EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  6. Engin Yaprak
  7. Akdemir İlknur
  8. SANEM NALBANTGİL
  9. MUSTAFA ÖZBARAN