İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2026

Wear, fracture strength, and reliability of three-unit definitive fixed dental prostheses fabricated with different vat polymerization methods

Journal of Dentistry

YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · hybrid SJR Q1 JCR Q1 Atıf 1 Üst %10 Yüzdelik 95.0% FWCI 8.85
Yıl
2026
ISSN
0300-5712
Tür
article

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİS YÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • OpenAlex OpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)

Özet

İngilizce (OpenAlex)

OBJECTIVES: To compare the wear, fracture strength, and reliability of definitive resin three-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) additively manufactured (AM) with different technologies to those subtractively manufactured (SM) from a high-impact polymer composite (HIPC). METHODS: , minimum occlusal thickness: 1 mm, cement space: 100 µm) were either AM from a resin for definitive use (VarseoSmile Triniq) using digital light processing (AM-DLP), low force display (AM-LFD), or liquid crystal display (AM-LCD) technologies, or SM from a HIPC (SM-HIPC) (n = 8). All FDPs replaced the right second premolar. All FDPs were scanned before and after thermomechanical aging and subjected to load-to-fracture testing. Pre- and post-aging scans were digitally assessed for maximum wear depth and volume loss. Wear and fracture data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests, while chi-squared tests were used to evaluate Weibull parameters (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Mean fracture loads ranged from 1013 to 2725 N, while mean characteristic strength values ranged from 1072 to 2895 N. SM-HIPC mostly had lower wear (P ≤ 0.018), and AM-DLP had lower volume loss than AM-LFD and AM-LCD (P < 0.001). SM-HIPC showed the highest fracture load and characteristic strength, while AM-LFD had higher fracture load and characteristic strength than AM-LCD (P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SM-HIPC demonstrated better wear resistance along with the highest fracture and characteristic strength. Among AM FDPs, AM-DLP showed the lowest volume loss, while AM-LFD withstood higher loads and exhibited greater characteristic strength than AM-LCD. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Three-unit FDPs fabricated with tested AM resin and digital light processing or low force display technologies may be suitable alternatives to those in high-impact polymer composite considering the reported masticatory forces of the molar region (1110 N). Nevertheless, they might also be more prone to complications related to wear.

Konular

  • Dental materials and restorations
  • Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
  • Dental Research and COVID-19

Birincil konu Dental materials and restorations

Yazarlar

  1. BETÜL ARSLAN ACİCBE BİRUNİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  2. sevda deniz
  3. MUSTAFA BORGA DÖNMEZ
  4. ALMİRA ADA DİKEN TÜRKSAYAR BİRUNİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  5. MÜNİR DEMİREL BİRUNİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ