İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2020 · article

Cellulose nanofibrils and nano-scaled titanium dioxide-reinforced biopolymer nanocomposites: Selecting the best nanocomposites with multicriteria decision-making methods

ISSN0021-9983
YÖKSİS OpenAlex
Yıl2020
Atıf13OpenAlex
Atıf13Semantic Scholar · 1 etkili
Yüzdelik%54,9
FWCI0,411,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q2
WoS (JCR)Q3

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıJOURNAL OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Journal of Composite Materials
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

The aim of the paper is to determine the effects of nano fillers such as cellulose nanofibrils and nano-scaled titanium dioxide on some properties of polyhydroxybutyrate and polylactic acid biopolymers; it also determined the selection of biopolymer nanocomposites with the optimum properties by using multicriteria decision-making methods such as multi-attribute utility theory, simple additive weighting, and weighted aggregated sum product assessment. Test results showed that the mechanical properties of the biopolymer nanocomposites generally increased with the addition of the cellulose nanofibrils and nano-scaled titanium dioxide. However, the addition of nano-scaled titanium dioxide decreased the tensile modulus. The addition of the cellulose nanofibrils had a higher effect on the tensile and flexure modulus of elasticity than the addition of the nano-scaled titanium dioxide. Thermal properties were generally found to improve with the addition of the cellulose nanofibrils and nano-scaled titanium dioxide. Melting temperature (T m ) generally decreased with the addition of the nano fillers. The scanning electron microscopic images showed that the nano fillers were dispersed as white dots in the biopolymer matrix. After accelerated weathering and decay test, outdoor performance of the biopolymer nanocomposites was found to be improved with the addition of the nano fillers. Multicriteria decision-making methods were conducted to determine the biopolymer nanocomposites having the optimum properties, and all the methods showed that the best biopolymer nanocomposites was polylactic acid with 1% cellulose nanofibrils.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

13atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 30 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2021 Selection of Superior Clones by the Multi-Dimensional Decision-Making Techniques in Scots Pine Seed OrchardAtıf 19 · OpenAlex
  2. 2021 Selection of Superior Clones by the Multi-Dimensional Decision-Making Techniques in Scots Pine Seed OrchardAtıf 19 · OpenAlex
  3. 2021 Selection of Superior Clones by the Multi-Dimensional Decision-Making Techniques in Scots Pine Seed OrchardAtıf 19 · OpenAlex
  4. 2021 Selection of Superior Clones by the Multi-Dimensional Decision-Making Techniques in Scots Pine Seed OrchardAtıf 19 · OpenAlex
  5. 2022 Wood Flour-Reinforced Green Composites: Parameter Optimization via Multi-criteria Decision-Making MethodsAtıf 15 · OpenAlex
  6. 2022 Wood Flour-Reinforced Green Composites: Parameter Optimization via Multi-criteria Decision-Making MethodsAtıf 15 · OpenAlex
  7. 2022 Wood Flour-Reinforced Green Composites: Parameter Optimization via Multi-criteria Decision-Making MethodsAtıf 15 · OpenAlex
  8. 2022 Wood Flour-Reinforced Green Composites: Parameter Optimization via Multi-criteria Decision-Making MethodsAtıf 15 · OpenAlex
  9. 2022 Wood Flour-Reinforced Green Composites: Parameter Optimization via Multi-criteria Decision-Making MethodsAtıf 15 · OpenAlex
  10. 2022 Wood Flour-Reinforced Green Composites: Parameter Optimization via Multi-criteria Decision-Making MethodsAtıf 15 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

5
  1. Havva Gümüş 1
  2. DENİZ AYDEMİR BARTIN ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2
  3. ERTUĞRUL ALTUNTAŞ 3
  4. RIFAT KURT BARTIN ÜNİVERSİTESİ 4
  5. EROL İMREN BARTIN ÜNİVERSİTESİ 5