İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2007 · article

Resistance to fracture of roots filled with three different techniques

ISSN1365-2591
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Üst %10
Yıl2007
Atıf76OpenAlex
Atıf83Semantic Scholar · 6 etkili
Yüzdelik%93,3
FWCI4,591,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q1
WoS (JCR)Q1

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıINTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)International Endodontic Journal
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

AIM: To compare the fracture resistance of roots filled with different materials. METHODOLOGY: Thirty-four freshly extracted human maxillary central incisor teeth with similar dimension were selected. Crowns were sectioned at the cemento-enamel junction, and the length of the roots were adjusted to 13 mm. Following the preparation of the root canals and final irrigation with EDTA and saline, the 10 root canals in group 1 were filled with Resilon cones and Epiphany sealer, the 10 root canals in group 2 were filled with gutta-percha and AH 26 and the 10 root canals in group 3 were filled with gutta-percha and MCS Canal Sealer. All materials were used with a cold lateral condensation technique. Four root canals remained unfilled and were used as a control group. Tests for fracture strength were performed using a universal testing machine and a round tip that had a diameter of 4 mm. The force was applied vertically with a constant speed of 1 mm min(-1). For each root, the force at the time of fracture was recorded in Newtons. Results were evaluated statistically with ANOVA and Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) tests. RESULTS: The mean force of fracture values was 1043 N, 967 N, 859 N and 517.5 N for groups 3, 1 and 2 and the control group, respectively. There was a significant difference (P < 0.01) between the experimental groups and the control group. No significant differences were found between the three experimental groups. CONCLUSIONS: All the materials used in the present study reinforced the prepared root canals.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

76atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 29 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2009 Fracture resistance of roots using different canal filling systemsAtıf 78 · OpenAlex
  2. 2012 Resistance to fracture of roots filled with different sealersAtıf 70 · OpenAlex
  3. 2012 Resistance to fracture of roots filled with different sealersAtıf 70 · OpenAlex
  4. 2010 Effect of Different Intraorifice Barriers on the Fracture Resistance of Roots Obturated with Resilon or Gutta PerchaAtıf 47 · OpenAlex
  5. 2010 Effect of Different Intraorifice Barriers on the Fracture Resistance of Roots Obturated with Resilon or Gutta PerchaAtıf 47 · OpenAlex
  6. 2010 Effect of Different Intraorifice Barriers on the Fracture Resistance of Roots Obturated with Resilon or Gutta PerchaAtıf 47 · OpenAlex
  7. 2010 Effect of Different Intraorifice Barriers on the Fracture Resistance of Roots Obturated with Resilon or Gutta PerchaAtıf 47 · OpenAlex
  8. 2007 Fracture Resistance of Roots Obturated with Three Different MaterialsAtıf 42 · OpenAlex
  9. 2007 Fracture resistance of roots obturated with three different materialsAtıf 42 · OpenAlex
  10. 2018 Effect of root canal sealers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of in vitro studiesAtıf 38 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

3
  1. BURAK SAĞSEN 1
  2. Yasemin KAHRAMAN 2
  3. GÜLŞEN AKDOĞAN ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ 3