İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2020 · article

L-shaped reinforced concrete retaining wall design: cost and sizing optimization

YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · diamond TR Index
Yıl2020
Atıf6OpenAlex
Atıf6Semantic Scholar · 1 etkili
Yüzdelik%69,7
FWCI0,731,00 = dünya ortalaması

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıChallenge Journal of Structural Mechanics
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

In the context of this study, the design of L-shaped reinforced concrete retaining walls have been scrutinized parametrically depending on the simultaneous analysis of cost and sizing with the use of a recent optimization algorithm. The differences and restrictions of L-shaped reinforced concrete retaining wall design than classical T-shaped walls have been also discussed. The foundation width and the thickness of the wall required for a safe design has been also investigated according to the change of excavation depth, the type of soil dominating field and the external loading conditions. The observed results from optimization analyses shows that the variation of the shear strength angle is the most significant soil geotechnical parameter for supplying an envisaged safe design against sliding, overturning and adequate bearing capacity. Concurrently, the excavation depth is the most important factor that is forming the necessity of the construction of the retaining structure and optimal dimension evaluation. It is also proved that the wall foundation width is the most effected dimension of the retaining structures by the change of design parameters and the cost difference is directly influenced by the change of sizing. A cost-effective wall design can be performed with the use of proposed optimization analysis is capable in a shorter time than the traditional methods. Eventually, it has shown that such optimization methods may be useful to find the optimal design requirements for geotechnical engineering structures.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

6atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 5 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2021 The Usage of the Harmony Search Algorithm for the Optimal Design Problem of Reinforced Concrete Retaining WallsAtıf 21 · OpenAlex
  2. 2021 The Usage of the Harmony Search Algorithm for the Optimal Design Problem of Reinforced Concrete Retaining WallsAtıf 21 · OpenAlex
  3. 2021 Adaptive-Hybrid Harmony Search Algorithm for Multi-Constrained Optimum Eco-Design of Reinforced Concrete Retaining WallsAtıf 21 · OpenAlex
  4. 2022 A generative design-to-BIM workflow for minimum weight plane truss designAtıf 12 · OpenAlex
  5. 2022 A generative design-to-BIM workflow for minimum weight plane truss designAtıf 12 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

4
  1. AYLİN ECE KAYABEKİR 1
  2. ZÜLAL AKBAY ARAMA İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ-CERRAHPAŞA 2
  3. GEBRAİL BEKDAŞ 3
  4. İLKNUR DALYAN 4