İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2019 · article

Evidence of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Expression in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT

ISSN0363-9762
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Üst %10
Yıl2019
Atıf53OpenAlex
Atıf43Semantic Scholar · 5 etkili
Yüzdelik%95,8
FWCI4,591,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q2
WoS (JCR)Q1

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıClinical Nuclear Medicine
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Clinical Nuclear Medicine
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression has been demonstrated in tumor neovasculature of many solid tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The purpose of this study is to evaluate PSMA expression in patients with HCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen HCC patients who underwent F-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) as part of restaging procedure also underwent Ga-PSMA PET. F-FDG PET and Ga-PSMA findings were compared visually as well as quantitatively using maximized standardized uptake values (SUVmax). RESULTS: FDG was positive in 15 patients while 16 patients demonstrated PSMA expression. The only extrahepatic finding was one metastatic lymph node detected by both tracers. Mean SUVmax of liver lesions on FDG PET/CT was 8.3 ± 2.3 and mean tumor to background ratio was 2.3 ± 1.5. Respective values for Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 17.4 ± 9 and 3.3 ± 2.2. On visual and quantitative evaluation uptake was higher with PSMA in nine patients and higher with FDG in four patients. PSMA and FDG activity were similar in three patients. One of the FDG positive patients was PSMA negative whereas two patients were PSMA positive but FDG negative. Heterogeneous uptake pattern was observed in three patients. Comparison of mean SUVmax and T/B values between PET studies revealed no statistically significant difference (P > 0.1). The mean survival was 25 months (range: 18-32 months) and SUVmax of PSMA (P = 0.05) and FDG (P = 0.012) showed medium strength of correlation with overall survival. CONCLUSION: PSMA expression in advanced HCC can be demonstrated by Ga-PSMA PET but is not superior to FDG PET however it could be useful for identifying patients with limited therapeutic options.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

53atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 19 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2021 Fibroblast-Activated Protein Inhibitor PET/CT: Cancer Diagnosis and Management.Atıf 39 · OpenAlex
  2. 2021 Fibroblast-Activated Protein Inhibitor PET/CT: Cancer Diagnosis and ManagementAtıf 39 · OpenAlex
  3. 2021 Prognostic significance of 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT in multiple myeloma recurrence: a comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT and laboratory resultsAtıf 38 · OpenAlex
  4. 2021 Prognostic significance of 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT in multiple myeloma recurrence: a comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT and laboratory resultsAtıf 38 · OpenAlex
  5. 2021 Prognostic significance of 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT in multiple myeloma recurrence: a comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT and laboratory resultsAtıf 38 · OpenAlex
  6. 2021 Prognostic significance of 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT in multiple myeloma recurrence: a comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT and laboratory resultsAtıf 38 · OpenAlex
  7. 2021 Prognostic significance of 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT in multiple myeloma recurrence: a comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT and laboratory resultsAtıf 38 · OpenAlex
  8. 2021 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Versus 18F-FDG PET/CT for Imaging of Hepatocellular CarcinomaAtıf 26 · OpenAlex
  9. 2021 <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT Versus <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT for Imaging of Hepatocellular CarcinomaAtıf 26 · OpenAlex
  10. 2021 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Versus 18F-FDG PET/CT for Imaging of Hepatocellular CarcinomaAtıf 26 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

7
  1. SERKAN KUYUMCU 1
  2. DUYGU HAS ŞİMŞEK 2
  3. RAIM ILIAZ 3
  4. Yasemin Sanli 4
  5. FİKRET BÜYÜKKAYA İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ 5
  6. Filiz Akyüz 6
  7. Cüneyt Türkmen 7