İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2026 · review

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis by the EAU-YAU urolithiasis and EAU endourology sections

ISSN1433-8726
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · hybrid
Yıl2026
Atıf1OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%89,1
FWCI2,541,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q1
WoS (JCR)Q1

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıWorld Journal of Urology
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)World Journal of Urology
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in safety and efficacy outcomes of PCNL between elderly and non-elderly patients, with special focus on commonly applied age cut-off values. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Comparative studies evaluating outcomes of PCNL in elderly versus non-elderly patients were identified through comprehensive searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to February 2026. Primary outcomes included overall, minor, and major complications, as well as stone-free rate (SFR). Subgroup analyses were performed according to different age thresholds used to define elderly populations (60, 65, and 70 years). RESULTS: Seventeen studies encompassing 45,603 patients, including 10,745 elderly individuals, were included. When pooled across all age definitions, rates of overall complications (OR 1.20, 95%CI 0.95-1.53) and major complications (OR 1.39, 95%CI 0.92-2.10) did not differ significantly between elderly and younger patients. Elderly patients demonstrated a significantly higher risk of postoperative sepsis (OR 3.94, 95%CI 1.83-8.47). SFR were comparable between groups. In subgroup analyses, studies applying a 70-year age cut-off demonstrated a significantly increased risk of overall complications (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.03-1.55) and major complications (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.15-3.31), whereas no significant differences were observed in studies using 60- or 65-year thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: PCNL can be performed safely in elderly patients, with SFR and complication profiles comparable to those observed in younger individuals when data across different elderly definitions are pooled. However, overall and major complications increases progressively with advancing age within the elderly population, especially among patients aged ≥ 70 years.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

1atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yazarlar

19
  1. Łukasz Nowak 1
  2. Begoña Ballesta Martinez 2
  3. Wojciech Krajewski 3
  4. Bhaskar Somani 4
  5. Amelia Pietropaolo 5
  6. Wojciech Tomczak 6
  7. Jan Łaszkiewicz 7
  8. Matthias Boeykens 8
  9. Thomas Tailly 9
  10. Theodoros Spinos 10
  11. Alberto Olivero 11
  12. Arman Tsaturyan 12
  13. Patrick Juliebø-Jones 13
  14. ŞENOL TONYALI İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ 14
  15. Agata Góral 15
  16. Paulina Biesiadecka 16
  17. Adam Chełmoński 17
  18. Bartosz Małkiewicz 18
  19. Tomasz Szydełko 19