İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2020 · article

Overview of the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM2) and key climate response of CMIP6 DECK, historical, and scenario simulations

ISSN1991-959X
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · gold Üst %1
Yıl2020
Atıf919OpenAlex
Atıf746Semantic Scholar · 26 etkili
Yüzdelik%99,9
FWCI38,01,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q1
WoS (JCR)Q1

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıGEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Geoscientific Model Development
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

Abstract. The second version of the coupled Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM2) is presented and evaluated. NorESM2 is based on the second version of the Community Earth System Model (CESM2) and shares with CESM2 the computer code infrastructure and many Earth system model components. However, NorESM2 employs entirely different ocean and ocean biogeochemistry models. The atmosphere component of NorESM2 (CAM-Nor) includes a different module for aerosol physics and chemistry, including interactions with cloud and radiation; additionally, CAM-Nor includes improvements in the formulation of local dry and moist energy conservation, in local and global angular momentum conservation, and in the computations for deep convection and air–sea fluxes. The surface components of NorESM2 have minor changes in the albedo calculations and to land and sea-ice models. We present results from simulations with NorESM2 that were carried out for the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). Two versions of the model are used: one with lower (∼ 2∘) atmosphere–land resolution and one with medium (∼ 1∘) atmosphere–land resolution. The stability of the pre-industrial climate and the sensitivity of the model to abrupt and gradual quadrupling of CO2 are assessed, along with the ability of the model to simulate the historical climate under the CMIP6 forcings. Compared to observations and reanalyses, NorESM2 represents an improvement over previous versions of NorESM in most aspects. NorESM2 appears less sensitive to greenhouse gas forcing than its predecessors, with an estimated equilibrium climate sensitivity of 2.5 K in both resolutions on a 150-year time frame; however, this estimate increases with the time window and the climate sensitivity at equilibration is much higher. We also consider the model response to future scenarios as defined by selected Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) from the Scenario Model Intercomparison Project defined under CMIP6. Under the four scenarios (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, and SSP5-8.5), the warming in the period 2090–2099 compared to 1850–1879 reaches 1.3, 2.2, 3.0, and 3.9 K in NorESM2-LM, and 1.3, 2.1, 3.1, and 3.9 K in NorESM-MM, robustly similar in both resolutions. NorESM2-LM shows a rather satisfactory evolution of recent sea-ice area. In NorESM2-LM, an ice-free Arctic Ocean is only avoided in the SSP1-2.6 scenario.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

919atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 5 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2025 Projected Drought Intensification in the Büyük Menderes Basin Under CMIP6 Climate ScenariosAtıf 2 · OpenAlex
  2. 2025 Projected Drought Intensification in the Büyük Menderes Basin Under CMIP6 Climate ScenariosAtıf 2 · OpenAlex
  3. 2025 Projected Drought Intensification in the Büyük Menderes Basin Under CMIP6 Climate ScenariosAtıf 2 · OpenAlex
  4. 2019 NCC NorESM2-LM model output prepared for CMIP6 DAMIPAtıf 2 · OpenAlex
  5. 2024 Resilient Stormwater Management of a Coastal CatchmentAtıf 0 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

27
  1. Oyvind Seland 1
  2. Mats Bentsen 2
  3. Dirk Olivie 3
  4. Thomas Toniazzo 4
  5. Ada Gjermundsen 5
  6. Lise Graff 6
  7. Jens Debernard 7
  8. Alok Gupta 8
  9. Yan-Chun He 9
  10. Alf Kirkevag 10
  11. Jorg Schwinger 11
  12. Jerry Tjiputra 12
  13. Kjetil Schanke Aas 13
  14. Ingo Bethke 14
  15. Yuanchao Fan 15
  16. Jan Griesfeller 16
  17. Alf Grini 17
  18. Chuncheng Guo 18
  19. MEHMET ILICAK İSTANBUL TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ 19
  20. Hafsahl Karset 20
  21. Oskar Landgren 21
  22. Johan Liakka 22
  23. Onsum Moseid 23
  24. Aleksi Nummelin 24
  25. Clemens Spensberger 25
  26. Hui Tang 26
  27. Zhongshi Zhang 27