İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2018 · article

Determination of a Sample-to-Cutoff Ratio to Predict True-Positivity in Blood Donor Samples Screened for Syphilis by a Chemiluminescent Immunoassay

Dergi Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences
ISSN2458-8938
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · bronze
Yıl2018
Atıf2OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%1,9
FWCI0,01,00 = dünya ortalaması

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıJournal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

Purpose: The use of Architect Syphilis TP CMIA in the blood bank raised the number of syphilis positive samples requiring confirmation. The aim of this study is to determine a sample-to-cutoff s/co ratio for CMIA predicting ≥95% of true-positive samples to reduce these samples.Methods: CMIA reactive samples n=177 were evaluated by Western blot WB as the reference standard, as well as by Treponema pallidum hemagglutination TPHA and Rapid Plasma Reagin RPR tests. The s/co ratio predicting ≥95% of true-positive samples was defined as the threshold leaving ≥95% of WB confirmed samples greater than the particular value. The performances of TPHA and RPR tests were also evaluated with respect to s/co ratios of CMIA positive samples.Results: The s/co ratio 15.17 predicted a true-positive result for ≥95% of samples tested 95% confidence interval: 85.9–99.3 and reduced the number of samples requiring confirmation by 29.9%. Higher s/co ratios were correlated with the increasing number of bands on WB strips p95% of positive samples with s/co ratios ≥15, its sensitivity was 47.7%.Conclusion: Higher s/co ratios can be used to define true-positivity and may indicate an active infection. TPHA may replace WB to confirm samples with s/co ratios between 3 and 15. RPR should not be used as a screening test in blood banks as it could miss almost half of the truepositive samples

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

2atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 7 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2022 Correlation of Treponemal Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay Screening Test Signal Strength Values With Reactivity of Confirmatory TestingAtıf 8 · OpenAlex
  2. 2022 Correlation of Treponemal Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay Screening Test Signal Strength Values With Reactivity of Confirmatory TestingAtıf 8 · OpenAlex
  3. 2022 Correlation of Treponemal Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay Screening Test Signal Strength Values With Reactivity of Confirmatory TestingAtıf 8 · OpenAlex
  4. 2022 Correlation of Treponemal Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay Screening Test Signal Strength Values with Reactivity of Confirmatory TestingAtıf 8 · OpenAlex
  5. 2022 Correlation of Treponemal Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay Screening Test Signal Strength Values With Reactivity of Confirmatory Testing.Atıf 8 · OpenAlex
  6. 2022 Correlation of Treponemal Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay Screening Test Signal Strength Values with Reactivity of Confirmatory TestingAtıf 8 · OpenAlex
  7. 2022 Correlation of Treponemal Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay Screening Test Signal Strength Values With Reactivity of Confirmatory TestingAtıf 8 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

4
  1. İlknur Ebru Akçakanat 1
  2. ÖZGEN ALPAY ÖZBEK DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2
  3. YAVUZ DOĞAN DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ 3
  4. YUSUF HAKAN ABACIOĞLU 4