Makale detayı · 2018 · article
Determination of a Sample-to-Cutoff Ratio to Predict True-Positivity in Blood Donor Samples Screened for Syphilis by a Chemiluminescent Immunoassay
Veri kaynağı ayrımı
- YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
- YÖKSİS dergi adıJournal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences
- OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
- Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)
Özet
Purpose: The use of Architect Syphilis TP CMIA in the blood bank raised the number of syphilis positive samples requiring confirmation. The aim of this study is to determine a sample-to-cutoff s/co ratio for CMIA predicting ≥95% of true-positive samples to reduce these samples.Methods: CMIA reactive samples n=177 were evaluated by Western blot WB as the reference standard, as well as by Treponema pallidum hemagglutination TPHA and Rapid Plasma Reagin RPR tests. The s/co ratio predicting ≥95% of true-positive samples was defined as the threshold leaving ≥95% of WB confirmed samples greater than the particular value. The performances of TPHA and RPR tests were also evaluated with respect to s/co ratios of CMIA positive samples.Results: The s/co ratio 15.17 predicted a true-positive result for ≥95% of samples tested 95% confidence interval: 85.9–99.3 and reduced the number of samples requiring confirmation by 29.9%. Higher s/co ratios were correlated with the increasing number of bands on WB strips p95% of positive samples with s/co ratios ≥15, its sensitivity was 47.7%.Conclusion: Higher s/co ratios can be used to define true-positivity and may indicate an active infection. TPHA may replace WB to confirm samples with s/co ratios between 3 and 15. RPR should not be used as a screening test in blood banks as it could miss almost half of the truepositive samples
Konular
Atıflar
OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.
2atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)
Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 7 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).
- 2022 Correlation of Treponemal Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay Screening Test Signal Strength Values With Reactivity of Confirmatory TestingAtıf 8 · OpenAlex
- 2022 Correlation of Treponemal Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay Screening Test Signal Strength Values With Reactivity of Confirmatory TestingAtıf 8 · OpenAlex
- 2022 Correlation of Treponemal Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay Screening Test Signal Strength Values With Reactivity of Confirmatory TestingAtıf 8 · OpenAlex
- 2022 Correlation of Treponemal Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay Screening Test Signal Strength Values with Reactivity of Confirmatory TestingAtıf 8 · OpenAlex
- 2022 Correlation of Treponemal Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay Screening Test Signal Strength Values With Reactivity of Confirmatory Testing.Atıf 8 · OpenAlex
- 2022 Correlation of Treponemal Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay Screening Test Signal Strength Values with Reactivity of Confirmatory TestingAtıf 8 · OpenAlex
- 2022 Correlation of Treponemal Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay Screening Test Signal Strength Values With Reactivity of Confirmatory TestingAtıf 8 · OpenAlex